L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol.34, issue.1/3, pp.197-216, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1014490210693

L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, and P. Livet, On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.34, issue.1-2, pp.1062-1093, 2008.
DOI : 10.1002/int.20307

L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons, Modelling dialogues using argumentation, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, pp.31-38, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/ICMAS.2000.858428

L. Amgoud and S. Vesic, A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.22, issue.5, pp.957-978, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exr037

P. Baroni, G. Boella, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, L. Van-der-torre et al., On the Input/Output behavior of argumentation frameworks, Artificial Intelligence, vol.217, pp.144-197, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2014.08.004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01075966

P. Baroni, M. Caminada, and M. Giacomin, An introduction to argumentation semantics . The knowledge engineering review, pp.365-410, 2011.

P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, and B. Liao, On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method, Artificial Intelligence, vol.212, pp.104-115, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2014.03.003

R. Baumann, What does it take to enforce an argument? minimal change in abstract argumentation, Proc. of ECAI, pp.127-132, 2012.

P. Bisquert, C. Cayrol, F. Dupin-de-saint-cyr-bannay, and M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, Characterizing change in abstract argumentation systems, Trends in Belief Revision and Argumentation Dynamics, pp.75-102, 2013.

G. Boella, D. M. Gabbay, L. Van-der-torre, and S. Villata, Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation, Annals of Mathematics and AI, vol.66, pp.163-197, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01076568

R. Booth, S. Kaci, T. Rienstra, and L. Van-der-torre, A Logical Theory about Dynamics in Abstract Argumentation, Proc. of SUM, pp.148-161, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_12
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00863487

C. Cayrol and M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks, Proc. of ECSQARU, pp.378-389, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11518655_33

C. Cayrol and M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.13, issue.3, pp.83-109, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/int.20389

C. Cayrol and M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding, IJAR, vol.54, issue.7, pp.876-899, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123535

C. Cayrol and M. C. Lagasquie-schiex, Change in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Systems
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_21
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01327084

A. Cohen, S. Gottifredi, A. J. García, and G. R. Simari, An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support, Journal of Applied Logic, vol.13, issue.4, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jal.2014.12.001

S. Coste-marquis, S. Konieczny, J. G. Mailly, and P. Marquis, A Translation-Based Approach for Revision of Argumentation Frameworks, Proc. of JELIA, pp.397-411, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_28

S. Doutre, A. Herzig, and L. Perrussel, A Dynamic Logic Framework for Abstract Argumentation, Proc. of KR, pp.62-71, 2014.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

D. M. Gabbay, Logical foundations for bipolar and tripolar argumentation networks: preliminary results, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.26, issue.1, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/ext027

N. Karacapilidis and D. Papadias, Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system, Information Systems, vol.26, issue.4, pp.259-277, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0306-4379(01)00020-5

F. Nouioua, AFs with Necessities: Further Semantics and Labelling Characterization, Proc. of SUM, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_10

F. Nouioua and V. Risch, Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks with Specialized Supports, 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp.215-218, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/ICTAI.2010.37

F. Nouioua and V. Risch, Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities, Proc. of SUM, pp.163-176, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_14

N. Oren and T. J. Norman, Semantics for evidence-based argumentation, Proc. of COMMA, pp.276-284, 2008.

N. Oren, C. Reed, and M. Luck, Moving between argumentation frameworks, Proc. of COMMA, pp.379-390, 2010.

S. Polberg and N. Oren, Revisiting support in abstract argumentation systems, Proc. of COMMA, pp.369-376, 2014.

H. Prakken, On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstraction of inferential relations, Proc. of ECAI, pp.735-740, 2014.

B. Verheij, DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, pp.319-346, 2003.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/13.3.319