ARGUMENTATION AND INFERENCE: A UNIFIED APPROACH - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication Année : 2013

ARGUMENTATION AND INFERENCE: A UNIFIED APPROACH

Myriam Quatrini

Résumé

We propose in this paper to use Ludics as a unified framework for the analysis of dialogue and the reasoning system. Not only is Ludics a logical theory, but it may also be built by means of concepts of game theory. We first present the main con- cepts of Ludics. A design is an abstraction and a generalization of the concept of proof. Interaction between designs is equivalent to cut elimination or modus ponens in logical theories. It appears to be a natural means for representing dialogues and also for rea- soning. A design is a set of sequences of alternate actions, similar to a move in game theory. We apply Ludics to argumentative dialogues. We discuss how to model the speech acts of argumen- tative dialogues in terms of dialogue acts. A dialogue act is given by a Ludics action together with the expression that reveals the action in a turn of speech. We show also how arguments may be stored in a commitment state used for reasoning. Finally we revisit an example of juridical dialogue that has been analyzed by Prakken in a different framework.

Dates et versions

hal-01290723 , version 1 (18-03-2016)

Identifiants

Citer

Myriam Quatrini, Christophe Fouqueré. ARGUMENTATION AND INFERENCE: A UNIFIED APPROACH. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 2013, The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Games, Game Theory and Game Semantics (8), pp.1-41. ⟨10.4148/1944-3676.1078⟩. ⟨hal-01290723⟩
160 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More