Glowing plants spark debate. Critics irked over planned release of engineered organism, Nature, vol.498, pp.15-16, 2013. ,
Science + crowdfunding: match or no match?, MIT Center for Civic Media Blog, 2013. ,
A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities, Environmental Monitoring Assessment, pp.273-291, 2011. ,
How Academic Biologists and Physicists View Science Outreach, PLoS ONE, vol.14, issue.4, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0036240
Peer-to-peer review and the future of scholarly authority, Social Epistemology, pp.161-179, 2010. ,
Social innovation fast pitch: American idol for social impact, The Gates Notes, http://www.gatesnotes.com/About-Bill-Gates/Social-Innovation-Fast- Pitch-American-Idol-for-Non-Profits, 2012. ,
Assessing the science???society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion, Technology in Society, vol.27, issue.4, pp.437-451, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.001
Crowd-funding: Cash on demand, Nature, vol.481, issue.7447, pp.147-149, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nj7447-147a
Are you being " grantist " ?, The Research Whisperer, 2014. ,
Bias in Peer Review of Organic Farming Grant Applications, Agriculture and Human Values, vol.8, issue.2, pp.181-188, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10460-005-6105-6
uBiome data policy, uBiome: blog, 2013. ,
The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature, Learned Publishing, vol.24, issue.1, pp.55-72, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1087/20110109
Ethical and practical issues for uBiome to keep working on, Doing Good Science, http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/doing-good-scienceethi- cal-and-practical-issues-for-ubiome-to-keep-working-on, 2013. ,