The Impact of Thymic Antigen Diversity on the Size of the Selected T Cell Repertoire, The Journal of Immunology, vol.172, issue.4, pp.2247-2255, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.4049/jimmunol.172.4.2247
Annual review of immunology, pp.139-176, 2003. ,
Kinetics and efficacy of positive selection in the thymus of normal and T cell receptor transgenic mice, Cell, vol.66, issue.3, pp.533-540, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90016-7
Thymic emigration: conveyor belts or lucky dips?, Immunology Today, vol.16, issue.6, pp.268-273, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0167-5699(95)80179-0
T-cell apoptosis detected in situ during positive and negative selection in the thymus, Nature, vol.372, issue.6501, pp.100-103, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1038/372100a0
In a radiation chimaera, host H???2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells, Nature, vol.1, issue.5627, pp.417-418, 1977. ,
DOI : 10.1084/jem.142.6.1349
Database (Oxford) . doi: 10, p.10, 1093. ,
An evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreAtIvE and GOA, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.6, issue.Suppl 1, p.17, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S17
Identifying mislabeled training data with the aid of unlabeled data, Applied Intelligence, vol.2, issue.2, pp.345-358, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10489-010-0225-4
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data, Bioinformatics, vol.16, issue.10, pp.906-914, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.906
Identifying Sources of Disagreement: Generalizability Theory in Manual Annotation Studies, Computational Linguistics, vol.22, issue.2, pp.3-8, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1412159
Remote Sensing of Environment, pp.503-515, 2000. ,
A theory of the learnable, Communications of the ACM, vol.27, issue.11, pp.1134-1142, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1968.1972
Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics, Computational Linguistics, vol.27, issue.1, pp.555-596, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.374
Reliability for 3+ Coders. [Online] Available: http://dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/recal3, 2013. ,