C. Ashlock and P. D. , Monophyly and Associated Terms, Systematic Biology, vol.20, issue.1, pp.63-69, 1971.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/20.1.63

P. D. Ashlock, Monophyly Again, Systematic Zoology, vol.21, issue.4, p.430, 1972.
DOI : 10.2307/2412435

P. D. Ashlock, The Uses of Cladistics, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol.5, issue.1, pp.81-99, 1974.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000501

P. D. Ashlock, An Evolutionary Systematist's View of Classification, Systematic Biology, vol.28, issue.4, pp.441-450, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/sysbio/28.4.441

D. Aubert, La transition bimembranées/unimembranées : Une révolution au royaume des bactéries? <https://hal.archives-ouvertes, 2013.

M. J. Benton and P. N. Pearson, Speciation in the fossil record, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.16, issue.7, pp.405-411, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02149-8

A. V. Brower, Evolution Is Not a Necessary Assumption of Cladistics, Cladistics, vol.12, issue.1, pp.143-154, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/clad.1998.0073

R. K. Brummitt, Taxonomy versus Cladonomy, a Fundamental Controversy in Biological Systematics, Taxon, vol.46, issue.4, pp.723-734, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/1224478

R. K. Brummitt, How to Chop up a Tree, Taxon, vol.51, issue.1, pp.31-41, 2002.
DOI : 10.2307/1554961

R. K. Brummitt, Further Dogged Defense of Paraphyletic Taxa, Taxon, vol.52, issue.4, pp.803-804, 2003.
DOI : 10.2307/3647353

R. K. Brummitt, Am I a Bony Fish?, Taxon, vol.55, issue.2, pp.268-269, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/25065576

R. K. Brummitt, Taxonomy versus cladonomy in the dicot families, pp.89-99, 2014.

R. K. Brummitt and M. S. Sosef, Paraphyletic Taxa Are Inherent in Linnaean Classification. A Reply to Freudenstein, Taxon, vol.47, issue.2, pp.411-412, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/1223771

T. Cavalier-smith, Kingdom Protozoa and its 18 phyla, Microbiol. Rev, vol.57, pp.953-994, 1993.

T. Cavalier-smith, A revised six-kingdom system of life, Biological Reviews, vol.92, issue.sec. II, pp.203-266, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x

T. Cavalier-smith, Obcells as Proto-Organisms: Membrane Heredity, Lithophosphorylation, and the Origins of the Genetic Code, the First Cells, and Photosynthesis, Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol.53, issue.4-5, pp.555-595, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/s002390010245

T. Cavalier-smith, The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification., International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol.52, issue.1, pp.7-76, 2002.
DOI : 10.1099/00207713-52-1-7

T. Cavalier-smith, Origins of the machinery of recombination and sex, Heredity, vol.88, issue.2, pp.125-141, 2002.
DOI : 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800034

T. Cavalier-smith, Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.99, issue.1470, pp.969-1006, 2006.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1111347

. Cavalier-smith, Deep phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.322, issue.5904, pp.111-132
DOI : 10.1126/science.1165340

. Cavalier-smith, Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution, Biology Direct, vol.5, issue.1, p.7
DOI : 10.1186/1745-6150-5-7

T. Cavalier-smith, Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa, European Journal of Protistology, vol.49, issue.2, pp.115-178, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001

T. Cavalier-smith, The Neomuran Revolution and Phagotrophic Origin of Eukaryotes and Cilia in the Light of Intracellular Coevolution and a Revised Tree of Life, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol.6, issue.9, p.16006, 2014.
DOI : 10.1101/cshperspect.a016006

D. J. Crawford, Progenitor-derivative species pairs and plant speciation, Taxon, vol.59, pp.1413-1423, 2010.

M. D. Crisp and G. T. Chandler, Paraphyletic species, Telopea, vol.6, issue.4, pp.813-844, 1996.
DOI : 10.7751/telopea19963037

C. R. Darwin, On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle For Life The roots of phylogeny: How did Haeckel build his trees?, Syst. Biol, vol.52, pp.515-527, 1859.

W. F. Doolittle and J. R. Brown, Tempo, mode, the progenote, and the universal root., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.91, issue.15, pp.6721-6728, 1994.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6721

D. Dumoulin and G. Ollivier, Comment peut-on être systématicien ? Rev, Anthropol. Connaiss, vol.72, pp.365-410, 2013.

M. C. Ebach, D. M. Williams, and T. A. Vanderlaan, Implementation as theory, hierarchy as transformation, homology as synapomorphy, Zootaxa, vol.3641, issue.5, pp.587-594, 2013.
DOI : 10.11646/zootaxa.3641.5.7

N. Eldredge and S. J. Gould, Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism Models in Paleobiology, Pp, pp.82-115, 1972.

M. Envall, On the difference between mono-, holo-, and paraphyletic groups: a consistent distinction of process and pattern, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol.94, issue.1, pp.217-220, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.00984.x

J. S. Farris, The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis Advances in Cladistics, pp.7-36, 1983.

J. S. Farris, THE PATTERN OF CLADISTICS, Cladistics, vol.31, issue.2, pp.190-201, 1985.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00422.x

J. S. Farris, 3ta Sleeps with the fishes, Cladistics, vol.71, issue.2, pp.422-436, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00390.x

J. S. Farris, ???Pattern cladistics??? really means paraphyly, Cladistics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.236-239, 2014.
DOI : 10.1111/cla.12044

J. Farris and . Kluge, A/The Brief History of Three-Taxon Analysis, Cladistics, vol.7, issue.4, pp.349-362, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00011.x

J. Felsenstein, Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively Misleading, Systematic Zoology, vol.27, issue.4, pp.401-410, 1978.
DOI : 10.2307/2412923

W. M. Fitch and K. Upper, The Phylogeny of tRNA Sequences Provides Evidence for Ambiguity Reduction in the Origin of the Genetic Code, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol.52, issue.0, pp.759-767, 1987.
DOI : 10.1101/SQB.1987.052.01.085

P. Forterre, A new fusion hypothesis for the origin of Eukarya: better than previous ones, but probably also wrong, Research in Microbiology, vol.162, issue.1, pp.77-91, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.10.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00580876

D. J. Funk and K. E. Omland, Species-Level Paraphyly and Polyphyly: Frequency, Causes, and Consequences, with Insights from Animal Mitochondrial DNA, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol.34, issue.1, pp.397-423, 2003.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421

A. S. George, The case against the transfer of Dryandra to Banksia (Proteaceae), pp.32-49, 2014.

M. T. Ghiselin, Mayr and Bock versus Darwin on genealogical classification, Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol.2, issue.4, pp.165-169, 2004.
DOI : 10.1080/106351599260337

J. S. Gilmour, A Taxonomic Problem, Nature, vol.139, issue.3529, pp.1040-1042, 1937.
DOI : 10.1038/1391040a0

N. Goldenfeld and C. R. Woese, Biology's next revolution, Nature, vol.445, issue.7126, p.369, 2007.
DOI : 10.1038/445369a

S. J. Gould and N. Eldredge, Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered, Paleobiology, vol.31, issue.02, pp.115-151, 1977.
DOI : 10.2307/2407283

L. Grande and O. , Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature: From Systematic Patterns to Evolutionary Process Theories, 1994.

W. Greuter, G. Garrity, D. L. Hawksworth, R. Jahn, P. M. Kirk et al., Principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms, Draft BioCode Taxon, vol.60, pp.201-212, 2011.

G. C. Griffiths, On the foundations of biological systematics, Acta Biotheoretica, vol.12, issue.1, pp.85-131, 1974.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01556343

P. E. Griffiths, Squarring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Pp, pp.208-228, 1999.

J. Gross and D. Bhattacharya, Uniting sex and eukaryote origins in an emerging oxygenic world, Biology Direct, vol.5, issue.1, p.53, 2010.
DOI : 10.1186/1745-6150-5-53

E. Haeckel, Generelle Morphologie der Organismen : Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, 1866.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110848281

E. Haeckel, Anthropogenie, oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen : Gemeinverständlich wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Grundzüge der menschlichen Keimes-und Stammes-Geschichte, 1874.
DOI : 10.5962/bhl.title.119035

E. Haeckel, Anthropogenie, oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen : Gemeinverständlich wissenschaftliche Vorträge über die Grundzüge der menschlichen Keimes-und Stammes-Geschichte, 1877.
DOI : 10.5962/bhl.title.119035

L. B. Halstead, Museum of errors, Nature, vol.288, issue.5788, p.208, 1980.
DOI : 10.1038/288208a0

A. W. Harvey, THREE-TAXON STATEMENTS: MORE PRECISELY, AN ABUSE OF PARSIMONY?, Cladistics, vol.35, issue.4, pp.345-354, 1992.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1992.tb00076.x

W. Hennig, Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik, 1950.

W. Hennig, "Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification?": A Reply to Ernst Mayr, Systematic Zoology, vol.24, issue.2, p.244, 1966.
DOI : 10.2307/2412765

E. Hörandl, Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy, Taxon, vol.56, pp.1-5, 2007.

E. Hörandl, Nothing in taxonomy makes sense except in the light of evolution: Examples from the classification of Ranunculus, pp.14-31, 2014.

E. Hörandl and T. F. Stuessy, Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification, Taxon, vol.59, pp.1641-1653, 2010.

J. S. Huxley, The three types of evolutionary process, Nature, vol.180, pp.454-455, 1957.

J. S. Huxley, . Sweden, and J. S. Huxley, Evolutionary processes and taxonomy with special reference to grades Systematics Today Clades and grades Function and Taxonomic Importance, Pp, pp.21-39, 1958.

G. Jékely, Origin of Eukaryotic Endomembranes: A Critical Evaluation of Different Model Scenarios, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol, vol.607, pp.38-51, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-74021-8_3

R. A. Keller, R. N. Boyd, and Q. D. Wheeler, The Illogical Basis of Phylogenetic Nomenclature, The Botanical Review, vol.3, issue.1, pp.93-110, 2003.
DOI : 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0093:TIBOPN]2.0.CO;2

E. V. Koonin, The origin and early evolution of eukaryotes in the light of phylogenomics, Genome Biology, vol.11, issue.5, p.209, 2010.
DOI : 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-209

T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962.

R. B. Kwok, Phylogeny, genealogy and the Linnaean hierarchy: a logical analysis, Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol.3, issue.5, pp.73-108, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00285-010-0364-6

S. P. Lapage, P. H. Sneath, E. F. Lessel, V. B. Skerman, H. P. Seeliger et al., International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria: Bacteriological Code, 1990.

J. Laporte, Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511527319

G. Lecointre, M. Bonnet, F. Cariou, G. Guillot, C. Lebas et al., Comprendre et enseigner la classification du vivant, Édition : 2e édition revue et augmentée Three-taxon statement analysis and its relation with primary data: Implications for cladistics and biogeography, 2005.

J. L. Martin and E. O. Wiley, Mathematical models and biological meaning: Taking trees seriously, PLoS Curr, vol.2, p.1196, 2010.

E. Mayr, Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?, Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol.16, issue.Suppl. 25, pp.94-128, 1974.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1974.tb00160.x

E. Mayr, Two empires or three?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.95, issue.17, pp.9720-9723, 1998.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9720

E. Mayr and W. J. Bock, Classifications and other ordering systems, Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol.16, issue.4, pp.169-194, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/s001140100228

J. Mcneill, F. R. Barrie, W. R. Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter et al., Formal analysis of phylogenetic terminology 53, International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, 2012.

C. A. Meacham and T. Duncan, The Necessity of Convex Groups in Biological Classification, Systematic Botany, vol.12, issue.1, pp.78-90, 1987.
DOI : 10.2307/2419216

L. L. Moroz, Phylogenomics meets neuroscience: How many times might complex brains have evolved?, Acta Biologica Hungarica, vol.63, issue.Supplement 2, pp.3-19, 2012.
DOI : 10.1556/ABiol.63.2012.Suppl.2.1

G. J. Nelson, Paraphyly and Polyphyly: Redefinitions, Systematic Biology, vol.20, issue.4, pp.471-472, 1971.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/20.4.471

G. J. Nelson, "Monophyly Again?"--A Reply to P. D. Ashlock, Systematic Biology, vol.22, issue.3, pp.310-312, 1973.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/22.3.310

G. J. Nelson and N. I. Platnick, THREE-TAXON STATEMENTS: A MORE PRECISE USE OF PARSIMONY?, Cladistics, vol.3016, issue.4, pp.351-366, 1991.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1991.tb00044.x

H. Nikolic, Quantum mechanics: Myths and facts. Found. Phys, pp.1563-1611, 2007.

D. Nilsson, Abstract, Visual Neuroscience, vol.279, issue.1-2, pp.5-20, 2013.
DOI : 10.2307/1539869

K. Padian, For Darwin, 'genealogy alone'did give classification, Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol.1, issue.2, pp.162-164, 2004.
DOI : 10.1080/106351599260337

K. Padian, Charles Darwin's Views of Classification in Theory and Practice, Systematic Biology, vol.48, issue.2, pp.352-364, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/106351599260337

A. Pais, Einstein and the quantum theory, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol.51, issue.4, pp.863-914, 1979.
DOI : 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.863

C. R. Paul, The recognition of ancestors, Historical Biology, vol.33, issue.4, pp.239-250, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/2412862

J. Podani, Taxonomy versus evolution, Taxon, vol.58, pp.1049-1053, 2009.

J. Podani, Taxonomy in evolutionary perspective, Synbiol. Hung, vol.6, pp.1-42, 2010.

J. Podani, Monophyly and paraphyly: A discourse without end?, Taxon, vol.59, pp.1011-1015, 2010.

J. Podani, Tree thinking, time and topology: comments on the interpretation of tree diagrams in evolutionary/phylogenetic systematics, Cladistics, vol.57, issue.1, pp.315-327, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00423.x

A. Poole and D. Penny, Eukaryote evolution: Engulfed by speculation, Nature, vol.441, issue.7147, p.913, 2007.
DOI : 10.1038/447913a

D. R. Prothero, Evolutionary Transitions in the Fossil Record of Terrestrial Hoofed Mammals, Evolution: Education and Outreach, vol.21, issue.2, pp.289-302, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s12052-009-0136-1

D. R. Prothero and D. B. Lazarus, Planktonic Microfossils and the Recognition of Ancestors, Systematic Biology, vol.29, issue.2, pp.119-129, 1980.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/29.2.119

M. Ridley, Can classification do without evolution?, New Sci, vol.100, pp.647-651, 1983.

O. Rieppel, Louis Agassiz (1807?1873) and the reality of natural groups, Biology and Philosophy, vol.3, issue.1, pp.29-47, 1988.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00127627

O. Rieppel, The PhyloCode: a critical discussion of its theoretical foundation, Cladistics, vol.3, issue.2, pp.186-197, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1994.tb00369.x

O. Rieppel, Re-writing Popper's philosophy of science for systematics, Hist. Philos. Life Sci, vol.30, pp.293-316, 2008.

L. H. Rieseberg and L. Brouillet, Are Many Plant Species Paraphyletic?, Taxon, vol.43, issue.1, pp.21-32, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/1223457

H. A. Ross, The incidence of species-level paraphyly in animals: A re-assessment, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol.76, pp.10-17, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.021

A. N. Schmidt-lebuhn, Fallacies and false premises-a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany, Cladistics, vol.57, issue.2, pp.174-187, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x

A. N. Schmidt-lebuhn, ???Evolutionary??? classifications do not have any information content-a reply to Stuessy and H??randl, Cladistics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.229-231, 2014.
DOI : 10.1111/cla.12037

A. N. Schmidt-lebuhn, J. M. De-vos, B. Keller, and E. Conti, Phylogenetic analysis of Primula section Primula reveals rampant non-monophyly among morphologically distinct species, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol.65, issue.1, pp.23-34, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.015

L. Shavit, D. Penny, M. D. Hendy, and B. R. Holland, The Problem of Rooting Rapid Radiations, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.24, issue.11, pp.2400-2411, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/molbev/msm178

G. G. Simpson, Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, Thirty Years of Numerical Taxonomy. Syst. Biol, vol.44, pp.281-298, 1961.

T. F. Stuessy, Schools of data analysis in systematics are converging, but differences remain with formal classification, Taxon, vol.62, issue.5, pp.876-885, 2013.
DOI : 10.12705/625.12

T. F. Stuessy and E. Hörandl, The importance of comprehensive phylogenetic (evolutionary) classification-a response to Schmidt-Lebuhn's commentary on paraphyletic taxa, Cladistics, vol.99, issue.3, pp.291-293, 2014.
DOI : 10.1111/cla.12038

T. F. Stuessy and C. König, Patrocladistic classification, Taxon, vol.57, pp.594-601, 2008.

T. F. Stuessy and C. König, Classification should not be constrained solely by branching topology in a cladistic context, Taxon, vol.58, pp.347-348, 2009.

R. Tuomikoski, Notes on some principles of phylogenetic systematics, Ann. Entomol. Fenn, vol.33, pp.137-147, 1967.

R. E. Valas and P. E. Bourne, Save the tree of life or get lost in the woods, Biology Direct, vol.5, issue.1, p.44, 2010.
DOI : 10.1186/1745-6150-5-44

R. E. Valas and P. E. Bourne, The origin of a derived superkingdom: how a gram-positive bacterium crossed the desert to become an archaeon, Biology Direct, vol.6, issue.1, p.16, 2011.
DOI : 10.1021/bi026428n

T. A. Vanderlaan, M. C. Ebach, D. M. Williams, and J. S. Wilkins, Defining and redefining monophyly: Haeckel, Hennig, Ashlock, Nelson and the proliferation of definitions, Australian Systematic Botany, vol.26, issue.5, pp.347-355, 2013.
DOI : 10.1071/SB13031

J. D. Velasco, The internodal species concept: a response to ???The tree, the network, and the species???, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol.93, issue.4, pp.865-869, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00955.x

L. Vogt, Popper and phylogenetics, a misguided rendezvous, Australian Systematic Botany, vol.27, issue.2, pp.85-94, 2014.
DOI : 10.1071/SB14025

M. Wilkinson, J. O. Mcinerney, R. P. Hirt, P. G. Foster, and T. M. Embley, Of clades and clans: terms for phylogenetic relationships in unrooted trees, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.22, issue.3, pp.114-115, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tree.2007.01.002

D. M. Williams, M. C. Ebach, and Q. D. Wheeler, Beyond belief, Pp, pp.169-197, 2010.

W. Willner, K. Hülber, and M. A. Fischer, Return of the grades: Towards objectivity in evolutionary classification, Preslia, vol.86, pp.233-243, 2014.

M. P. Winsor, Taxonomy was the foundation of Darwin's evolution, Taxon, vol.58, pp.43-49, 2009.

C. R. Woese, Default taxonomy: Ernst Mayr's view of the microbial world, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.95, issue.19, pp.11043-11046, 1998.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11043

R. H. Zander, Structuralism in Phylogenetic Systematics, Biological Theory, vol.57, issue.4, pp.383-394, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00606-010-0281-6

R. H. Zander, A Framework for Post-Phylogenetic Systematics, 2013.

R. H. Zander, Evolutionary analysis of five bryophyte families using virtual fossils, Anales del Jard??n Bot??nico de Madrid, vol.66, issue.2, pp.263-277, 2009.
DOI : 10.3989/ajbm.2224

R. H. Zander, Taxon mapping exemplifies punctuated equilibrium and atavistic saltation, Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol.66, issue.Suppl 3, pp.69-90, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00606-010-0281-6

R. H. Zander, Classical determination of monophyly, exemplified with Didymodon s. lat. (Bryophyta) Part 1 of 3, synopsis and simplified concepts, Phytoneuron, vol.78, pp.1-7

R. H. Zander, Classical determination of monophyly, exemplified with Didymodon s. lat. (Bryophyta) Part 2 of 3, concepts, Phytoneuron, vol.79, pp.1-23

R. H. Zander, Classical determination of monophyly, exemplified with Didymodon s. lat. (Bryophyta) Part 3 of 3, analysis, Phytoneuron, vol.80, pp.1-19