L. Amgoud and P. Besnard, Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.28, issue.3, 2013.
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01124391

L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol.29, issue.2, pp.125-169, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021603608656

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

P. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

A. García and G. Simari, Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, vol.4, issue.1+2, pp.95-138, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S1471068403001674

N. Gorogiannis and A. Hunter, Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties, Artificial Intelligence, vol.175, issue.9-10, pp.9-10, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2010.12.003

G. Governatori, M. Maher, G. Antoniou, and D. Billington, Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.14, issue.5, pp.675-702, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/14.5.675

V. Marek, A. Nerode, and J. Remmel, A theory of nonmonotonic rule systems I, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol.13, issue.1-4, pp.241-273, 1990.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01531080

R. Reiter, A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, vol.13, issue.1-2, pp.81-132, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4