Constructing Weighted Argumentation Framework with Cognitive Maps

Abstract : Cognitive map is a qualitative decision model which is frequently used in social science and decision making applications. This model allows to easily organize individuals’ judgments, thinking or beliefs about a given problem in a graphical representation containing different concepts and influences between them. However, reasoning on this model presents some limits and remains a difficult task. For example, cognitive maps do not model uncertainty within the variables, and only deductive reasoning (predicting an effect given a cause) is possible. In this paper, we show how to translate the knowledge represented in cognitive maps in the form of arguments and attack relations among them. In particular, given a decision problem, a cognitive map was first built by eliciting knowledge from experts and then transforming it in a weighted argumentation framework (WAF for short) for ensuring efficient reasoning. Another contribution of this paper concerns enriching the WAF obtained from a given cognitive map for dealing with dynamics through the consideration of a varying set of observations.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [15 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Louis Bonneau de Beaufort <>
Submitted on : Thursday, November 19, 2015 - 4:19:33 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, March 21, 2019 - 1:00:25 PM
Long-term archiving on : Friday, April 28, 2017 - 2:53:36 PM


Files produced by the author(s)



Karima Sedki, Louis Bonneau de Beaufort. Constructing Weighted Argumentation Framework with Cognitive Maps. International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), IEEE, Nov 2015, Vietri sul Mare, Italy. ⟨10.1109/ICTAI.2015.108⟩. ⟨hal-01231192⟩



Record views


Files downloads