Can some patients avoid adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer?, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol.116, issue.5, pp.272-279, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.19
Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.98, issue.19, p.11553815, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.191367098
Tumor size and survival in breast cancer???a reappraisal, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol.27, issue.6, pp.348-353, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.39
Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy, Clinical Cancer Research, vol.11, issue.16, pp.5678-5685, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2421
Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes, Nature, vol.274, issue.7403, pp.405-409, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature11154
The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer, Nature, vol.135, pp.400-404, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature11017
Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers, Oncogene, vol.23, issue.13, p.17001317, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1038/sj.onc.1209985
A refined molecular taxonomy of breast cancer, Oncogene, vol.10, issue.9, pp.1196-1206, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature09515
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00611752
Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, vol.63, issue.6, pp.479-489, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb01032.x
Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol.63, issue.Suppl, pp.895-915, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10549-011-1837-z
Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer: Understanding the Molecular Basis of Histologic Grade To Improve Prognosis, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.98, issue.4, pp.262-272, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djj052
Prognostic Value of a Combined Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, Ki-67, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemical Score and Comparison With the Genomic Health Recurrence Score in Early Breast Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.29, issue.32, pp.4273-4278, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2835
Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies, Cancer Cell, vol.10, issue.6, pp.529-541, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.009
The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups, Nature, vol.452, pp.346-352, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature10983
Paradoxical Relationship between Chromosomal Instability and Survival Outcome in Cancer, Cancer Research, vol.71, issue.10, pp.3447-3452, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3667
A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers, Nature Genetics, vol.1, issue.9, p.16921376, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nrc1802
Validated prediction of clinical outcome in sarcomas and multiple types of cancer on the basis of a gene expression signature related to genome complexity, Nature Medicine, vol.99, issue.7, pp.781-787, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nm.2174
The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome, International Journal of Cancer, vol.21, issue.7, pp.1552-1564, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/ijc.24017
Relationship of Extreme Chromosomal Instability with Long-term Survival in a Retrospective Analysis of Primary Breast Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol.20, issue.10, pp.2183-2194, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0343
A prognostic DNA signature for T1T2 node-negative breast cancer patients, Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, vol.69, issue.Suppl 6, p.20842727, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/gcc.20820
Genomic Architecture Characterizes Tumor Progression Paths and Fate in Breast Cancer Patients, Science Translational Medicine, vol.2, issue.38, pp.38-47, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000611
Patterns and incidence of chromosomal instability and their prognostic relevance in breast cancer subtypes, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol.107, issue.2, pp.23-30, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10549-010-1026-5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00615363
ONCOPOOL ??? A European database for 16,944 cases of breast cancer, European Journal of Cancer, vol.46, issue.1, pp.56-71, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.009
pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, vol.9, issue.5, pp.403-410, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90171-X
Integrated Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma In situ of the Breast, Clinical Cancer Research, vol.14, issue.7, pp.1956-1965, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1465
Respective prognostic value of genomic grade and histological proliferation markers in early stage (pN0) breast carcinoma, PLOS ONE, vol.7, p.22529987, 2012. ,
Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.103, issue.22, pp.1656-1664, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djr393
Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011, Annals of Oncology, vol.22, issue.8, pp.1736-1747, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/annonc/mdr304
Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor???Positive Tumor Cells Within Immunohistochemically Defined Luminal A Breast Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.31, issue.2, p.23233704, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4134
ESR1 gene amplification in breast cancer: a common phenomenon? Nat Genet 40: 802; author reply: 802. doi:10, pp.708-810, 1038. ,
runed dynamic programming for optimal multiple change-point detection, 2010. ,
A Modified Bayes Information Criterion with Applications to the Analysis of Comparative Genomic Hybridization Data, Biometrics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.22-32, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00662.x
Joint segmentation, calling, and normalization of multiple CGH profiles, Biostatistics, vol.12, issue.3, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq076
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01019859
Adjuvant chemotherapy yes or no? Prognostic markers in early breast cancer, Annals of Oncology, vol.18, issue.Supplement 12, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1093/annonc/mdm532
Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients, The Breast, vol.17, issue.4, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.breast.2008.02.002
A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.351, issue.27, pp.2817-282610, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa041588
Breast cancer: Should we assess HER2 status by Oncotype DX???, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol.360, issue.1, pp.12-14, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.188
DX Test: An Independent Quality Assurance Study, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.29, issue.32, pp.4279-4285, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7963
Assessment of the contribution of the IHC4+C score to decision making in clinical practice in early breast cancer, British Journal of Cancer, vol.19, issue.11, p.22531639, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2217/14796694.4.5.603
Risk of Recurrence and Chemotherapy Benefit for Patients With Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor???Positive Breast Cancer: Recurrence Score Alone and Integrated With Pathologic and Clinical Factors, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.29, issue.33, pp.4365-4372, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.3714
Array CGH and PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations to drive patients to specific targeted agents: A clinical experience in 108 patients with metastatic breast cancer, European Journal of Cancer, vol.48, issue.15, p.22840369, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.06.014
CGH arrays compared for DNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, vol.38, issue.105, pp.344-352, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1002/gcc.21920