An afterthought on let alone

Abstract : We here revisit the let alone construction, which was first described in a 1980s paper that put Construction Grammar on the map. Our focus is on a seemingly aberrant use where the first conjunct does not entail the restored second conjunct, as in I don't have ten children, let alone one. We argue that this use should not be considered as a highly exceptional speech error or as evidence that some speakers wrongly assume that the first proposition is the entailed one. First, a systematic examination of let alone examples extracted from the BNC and COCA shows that it is not exceedingly rare, as does a growing collection of authentic examples we have collected over the years. Second, it constitutes a usage type in its own right, whereby the first proposition has most contextual relevance and the second conjunct is represented by the speaker as an apophasis-like afterthought. There are transitional cases between the two types (canonical and afterthought), where both conjuncts have considerable relevance. For contemporary speakers, the afterthought use may require extraction of a general pattern with bleached semantics and pragmatics, possibly refilled in with specific information.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier, 2015, 80, pp.70-85. 〈10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.005〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [35 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : Bert Cappelle <>
Soumis le : lundi 26 octobre 2015 - 14:47:05
Dernière modification le : mardi 3 juillet 2018 - 11:46:31
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mercredi 27 janvier 2016 - 11:01:37


An afterthought on let alone_c...
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)




Bert Cappelle, Edwige Dugas, Vera Tobin. An afterthought on let alone. Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier, 2015, 80, pp.70-85. 〈10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.005〉. 〈hal-01219314〉



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers