R. Azevedo, Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computerbased learning environments: an introduction. Metacognition and Learning, vol.2, pp.57-65, 2007.

R. Azevedo, Theoretical, methodological, and analytical challenges in the research on metacognition and self-regulation: A commentary, vol.4, pp.87-95, 2009.

R. Azevedo, R. Feyzi-behnagh, M. Duffy, J. Harley, and G. Trevors, Metacognition and self-regulated learning in student-centered learning environments, Theoretical foundations of learning environments. NY: Routledge, 2012.

R. Azevedo, J. Harley, G. Trevors, M. Duffy, R. Feyzi-behnagh et al., Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agents systems, 2013.

R. Azevedo, A. Johnson, A. Chauncey, and C. Burkett, Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with MetaCognitive tools, pp.225-247, 2010.

A. L. Baylor, The design of motivational agents and avatars. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.59, pp.291-300, 2011.

G. Biswas, K. Leelawong, D. Schwartz, and N. Vye, Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software, Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol.19, pp.363-392, 2005.

S. Choi and R. Clark, Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent for learning English as a second language, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol.34, issue.4, pp.441-466, 2006.

A. De-angeli and S. Branham, I hate you! Disinhibition with virtual partners, Interacting with Computers, vol.20, issue.3, pp.302-310, 2008.

A. Graesser and D. Macnamara, Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language, Educational Psychologist, vol.45, issue.4, pp.234-244, 2010.

J. Greene and R. Azevedo, Theoretical, conceptual, and methodological issues in the measurement of cognitive and metacognitive processes during learning with computer-based learning environments, Educational Psychologist, vol.45, issue.4, pp.203-209, 2010.

A. F. Hadwin, S. Järvelä, and M. Miller, Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning, pp.65-84, 2011.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203839010.ch5

R. Pekrun, T. Goetz, A. Frenzel, P. Barchfeld, and R. Pery, Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ), Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.36, pp.36-48, 2011.

A. Gulz, Social enrichment by virtual characters-Differential benefits, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.21, pp.405-418, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00147.x

G. T. Jackson and A. C. Graesser, Artificial intelligence in education: Building technology rich learning contexts that work, 2007.

Y. Kim and A. Baylor, A socio-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.54, issue.6, pp.569-596, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11423-006-0637-3

Y. Kim and Q. Wei, The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment, Computers in Education, vol.56, pp.505-514, 2011.

N. C. Kramer and G. Bente, Personalize e-learning: The social effects of pedagogical agents, Educational Psychology Review, vol.22, pp.71-87, 2010.

M. M. Louwerse, A. C. Graesser, S. Lu, and H. H. Mitchell, Social cues in animated conversational agents, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.19, issue.6, pp.693-704, 2005.
DOI : 10.1002/acp.1117

M. Lusk and R. Atkinson, Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples?, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.21, pp.747-764, 2007.

E. Sklar and D. Richards, Agent-based systems for human learners, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.25, issue.2, pp.111-135, 2010.
DOI : 10.1017/s0269888910000044

K. Vanlehn, The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems, Educational Psychologist, vol.46, issue.4, pp.197-221, 2011.

G. Veletsianos, Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent: Considering contextual relevance and aesthetics, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol.36, issue.4, pp.373-377, 2007.

G. Veletsianos, Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: Visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning, Computers in Education, vol.55, issue.2, pp.576-585, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.019
URL : http://www.veletsianos.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/pedagogical_agents_stereotypes.pdf

G. Veletsianos and S. R. Russell, Pedagogical agents, Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp.759-769, 2014.

H. L. Woo, Designing multimedia learning environments using animated pedagogical agents: Factors and issues, Journal Computer Assisted Learning, vol.25, pp.203-218, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00299.x

P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, Studying as self-regulated learning, Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp.277-304, 1998.

P. H. Winne and N. E. Perry, Measuring self-regulated learning, pp.531-566, 2000.

, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 2011.

A. Witherspoon, R. Azevedo, and S. Mello, The dynamics of self-regulatory processes within selfand externally-regulated learning episodes, Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.5091, pp.260-269, 2008.