Trade and Colonial Status

Abstract : Does colonisation explain differences in trade performance across developing countries? In this paper, we analyse the differential impact of British versus French colonial legacies on the current trade of African ex-colonies. We initially find that former British colonies trade more, on average, than do their French counterparts. This difference might be the result of the relative superiority of British institutions. However, a core concern is the non-random selection of colonies by the British. Historians argue that with Britain, trade preceded colonisation. Using an instrument based on colonisation history to control for this endogeneity, we find no evidence of a systematic difference between the British and French colonial legacies with respect to trade. This finding suggests that the apparent better performance of British ex-colonies might be instead explained by pre-colonial conditions.
Keywords : macroéconomie
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of African Economies, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2012, 21 (3), pp.409-439. 〈10.1093/jae/ejs001〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01208809
Contributeur : Archive Ouverte Prodinra <>
Soumis le : vendredi 2 octobre 2015 - 20:26:56
Dernière modification le : jeudi 2 février 2017 - 16:02:09

Identifiants

Citation

José De Sousa, Julie Lochard. Trade and Colonial Status. Journal of African Economies, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2012, 21 (3), pp.409-439. 〈10.1093/jae/ejs001〉. 〈hal-01208809〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

60