Statistical Tests of Host-Parasite Cospeciation, Evolution, vol.51, issue.2, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2411113
A Statistical Test for Host-Parasite Coevolution, Systematic Biology, vol.51, issue.2, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1080/10635150252899734
Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation, and Coevolution, 1 edition, 2002. ,
A Model-Based Approach for Detecting Coevolving Positions in a Molecule, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.22, issue.9, pp.1919-1928, 1919. ,
DOI : 10.1093/molbev/msi183
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00105363
Reducing phylogenetic bias in correlated mutation analysis, Protein Engineering Design and Selection, vol.23, issue.5, pp.321-326, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1093/protein/gzp078
Eucaryotic genome evolution through the spontaneous duplication of large chromosomal segments, The EMBO Journal, vol.23, issue.1, pp.234-243, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600024
Does Recombination Shape the Distribution and Evolution of Tandemly Arrayed Genes (TAGs) in the Arabidopsis thaliana Genome?, Genome Research, vol.13, issue.12, pp.2533-2540, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1101/gr.1318503
Predicting functional gene links from phylogenetic-statistical analyses of whole genomes, PLoS Comput Biol, 2005. ,
Bayesian Estimation of Concordance among Gene Trees, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.24, issue.2, pp.412-426, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1093/molbev/msl170
Coevolution of gene families in prokaryotes, Genome Research, vol.18, issue.3, pp.462-468, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1101/gr.6815508
Efficient algorithms for reconstructing gene content by co-evolution, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.12, issue.Suppl 9, p.12, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/nar/gkn760
Uncovering the co-evolutionary network among prokaryotic genes, Bioinformatics, vol.28, issue.18, pp.389-394 ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts396
Consensus supertrees: The synthesis of rooted trees containing overlapping sets of labeled leaves, Journal of Classification, vol.46, issue.2, p.335335, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01894195
Supertree Construction in the Genomic Age, Methods Enzymol, vol.395, pp.745-757, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95038-6
Models, algorithms and programs for phylogeny reconciliation, Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol.12, issue.5, pp.392-400, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bib/bbr045
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00825041
REPRESENTING A SET OF RECONCILIATIONS IN A COMPACT WAY, Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, vol.11, issue.02, p.11, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1142/S0219720012500254
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00818801
Support Measures to Estimate the Reliability of Evolutionary Events Predicted by Reconciliation Methods, PLoS ONE, vol.93, issue.10 ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0073667.s001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01189798
An Efficient Algorithm for Gene/Species Trees Parsimonious Reconciliation with Losses, Duplications and Transfers, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Comparative Genomics, RECOMB-CG'10, pp.93-108, 1927866. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16181-0_9
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00818889
Reconciliation and local gene tree rearrangement can be of mutual profit, Algorithms for Molecular Biology, vol.8, issue.1, p.12, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1202997109
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00812726
Rapid evolutionary innovation during an Archaean genetic expansion, Nature, vol.15, issue.7328, pp.93-96 ,
DOI : 10.1038/nature09649