The Index of Economic Freedom: Methodological matters

Abstract : Composite indicators (CIs) are essential in public debates and policies so the social demand for synthetic tools is constantly increasing. They are also subject to criticism (see Saisana and Saltelli 2010; Klugman et al., 2011) due to lack of a gold standard in their construction. The Index of Economic Freedom (IEF) is one of these tools subject to criticism because it suffers from methodological matters. The IEF lacks statistical validity because two of its components are strongly and negatively correlated with the others. Both components are causing significant variations in 95 percent of countries ranked. This paper deals with these issues by using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Benefit Of the Doubt (BOD) methods to generate component and country specific weights in computing the scores. The PCA and BOD analyses provide consistent results that differ dramatically with the baseline ones (results using equal weights). Given stable results provided by the PCA and BOD analysis, the IEF would receive broad legitimacy basing the calculation of its scores on endogenous weighting models.
Type de document :
Pré-publication, Document de travail
2015
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [5 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01178202
Contributeur : Benoît Sévi <>
Soumis le : vendredi 17 juillet 2015 - 16:11:22
Dernière modification le : samedi 18 août 2018 - 01:14:05
Document(s) archivé(s) le : dimanche 18 octobre 2015 - 11:04:26

Fichier

LEMNA_WP_2015-16.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01178202, version 1

Citation

Issaka Dialga, Thomas Vallée. The Index of Economic Freedom: Methodological matters. 2015. 〈hal-01178202〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

280

Téléchargements de fichiers

1641