Explaining Argumentation over Alignment Agreements

Abstract : Argumentation frameworks have been used as tools for reconciliating ontology alignments, through a series of proposals and counter-proposals, i.e., arguments. However, argumentation outcomes may not be so obvious to human users. Explaining the reasoning behind the argumentation process may help users to understand its outcome, and influence the user's confidence and acceptance on the results. This paper presents a mechanism for providing explanations on the way agreed alignments are established. Our mechanism is based on tracing each step of the argumentation process. These traces are then interpreted using a set of association rules, built from a decision tree that represents all possible statuses of arguments. From these rules, a multi-level explanation, in natural language, is provided to the users.
Type de document :
Communication dans un congrès
IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence WI and Intelligent Agent Technologies IAT 2013, Nov 2013, Atlanta, United States. pp. 80-85, 2013
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01151026
Contributeur : Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (oatao) <>
Soumis le : mardi 12 mai 2015 - 12:48:27
Dernière modification le : vendredi 10 février 2017 - 01:06:15
Document(s) archivé(s) le : lundi 14 septembre 2015 - 23:03:12

Fichier

Wannous_12954.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01151026, version 1
  • OATAO : 12954

Collections

Citation

Rouaa Wannous, Cassia Trojahn. Explaining Argumentation over Alignment Agreements. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence WI and Intelligent Agent Technologies IAT 2013, Nov 2013, Atlanta, United States. pp. 80-85, 2013. <hal-01151026>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

45

Téléchargements du document

18