L. Amgoud, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.55, issue.9, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123709

L. Amgoud and P. Besnard, Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.28, issue.3, 2013.
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01124391

L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons, Modelling dialogues using argumentation, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, pp.31-38, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/ICMAS.2000.858428

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Using arguments for making and explaining decisions, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.3-4, pp.413-436, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

L. Amgoud and S. Vesic, On the Equivalence of Logic-Based Argumentation Systems, SUM'11, pp.123-136, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_11

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments??????This is an extended version of a paper entitled ???Towards a logic-based theory of argumentation??? published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'2000), Austin, TX, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000., Artificial Intelligence, vol.128, issue.1-2, pp.203-235, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00071-6

E. Bonzon and N. Maudet, On the Outcomes of Multiparty Persuasion, 10th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp.47-54, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01273221

E. Cabrio and S. Villata, Natural language arguments: A combined approach, 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.205-210, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00724780

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

M. Elvang-gøransson, J. Fox, and P. Krause, Acceptability of arguments as ???logical uncertainty???, ECSQARU'93, pp.85-90, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0028186

J. Fox and S. Parsons, Arguing about beliefs and actions, Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms, pp.266-302, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-49426-X_13

A. García and G. Simari, Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, pp.95-138, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S1471068403001674

M. Johnson, P. Mcburney, and S. Parsons, When Are Two Protocols the Same?, Communication in Multiagent Systems, pp.253-268, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-44972-0_14

A. Kakas and P. Moraitis, Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation, Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems , AAMAS '06, pp.384-391, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1160633.1160701

D. Kontarinis, E. Bonzon, N. Maudet, and P. Moraitis, Picking the right expert to make a debate uncontroversial, Comp. Models of Arg, pp.486-497, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00752451

P. Mcburney, D. Hitchcock, and S. Parsons, The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.2, issue.1, pp.95-132, 2007.
DOI : 10.1002/int.20191

S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings, Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.8, issue.3, pp.261-292, 1998.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/8.3.261

J. L. Pollock, How to reason defeasibly, Artificial Intelligence, vol.57, issue.1, pp.1-42, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(92)90103-5

H. Prakken, Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.15, issue.6, pp.1009-1040, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exi046

G. Quiroz, D. Apothéloz, and P. Brandt, How counterargumentation works. Argumentation Illuminated, pp.172-177, 1992.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00870263

. Woodger, chapter On Some Fundamental Concepts of Metamathematics, 1956.

S. Zabala, I. Lara, and H. Geffner, Beliefs, reasons and moves in a model for argumentative dialogues