]. A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics. The Finite-Difference Time Domain Method, 2005.

E. Conil, A. Hadjem, A. Gati, M. Wong, and J. Wiart, Influence of Plane-Wave Incidence Angle on Whole Body and Local Exposure at 2100 MHz, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol.53, issue.1, pp.48-52, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TEMC.2010.2061849

E. Conil, A. Hadjem, F. Lacroux, M. F. Wong, and J. Wiart, Variability analysis of SAR from 20 MHz to 2.4 GHz for different adult and child models using finite-difference time-domain, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.53, issue.6, pp.1511-1525, 2008.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/001

J. Wiart, A. Hadjem, M. F. Wong, and I. Bloch, Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults, Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol.53, issue.13, pp.3681-3695, 2008.
DOI : 10.1088/0031-9155/53/13/019

L. Bibin, J. Anquez, J. P. De-la-plata-alcade, T. Boubekeur, E. D. Angelini et al., Whole-body pregnant woman modeling by digital geometry processing with detailed uterofetal unit based on medical images, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.57, issue.10, pp.2346-2358, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/TBME.2010.2053367

M. Jala, E. Conil, N. Varsier, J. Wiart, A. Hadjem et al., Simplified pregnant woman models for the fetus exposure assessment, Comptes Rendus Physique, vol.14, issue.5, pp.412-417, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.crhy.2013.02.008

R. G. Ghanem and P. D. Spanos, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6

G. Blatman and B. Sudret, An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol.25, issue.2, pp.183-197, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003

G. Blatman and B. Sudret, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.230, issue.6, pp.2345-2367, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.021

J. Sacks, S. B. Schiller, and W. J. Welch, Designs for Computer Experiments, Technometrics, vol.15, issue.18, pp.41-47, 1989.
DOI : 10.1080/00401706.1989.10488474

C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. Williams, Gaussian Processes in Machine Learning, 2006.
DOI : 10.1162/089976602317250933
URL : http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-F365-A

T. Santner, B. Williams, and W. Notz, The design and analysis of computer experiments, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4757-3799-8

N. Wiener, The Homogeneous Chaos, American Journal of Mathematics, vol.60, issue.4, pp.897-936, 1938.
DOI : 10.2307/2371268

D. Xiu and G. E. Karniadakis, The Wiener--Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol.24, issue.2, pp.619-644, 2002.
DOI : 10.1137/S1064827501387826

D. Lucor and G. Karniadakis, Physical Systems with Random Uncertainties: Chaos Representations with Arbitrary Probability Measure, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol.26, issue.2, pp.750-735, 2004.

C. Soize and R. Ghanem, Physical Systems with Random Uncertainties: Chaos Representations with Arbitrary Probability Measure, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol.26, issue.2, pp.395-410, 2004.
DOI : 10.1137/S1064827503424505
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00686211

O. P. Le-maitre, M. T. Reagan, H. N. Najm, R. G. Ghanem, and O. M. Knio, A Stochastic Projection Method for Fluid Flow, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.181, issue.1, pp.9-44, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.2002.7104

L. Gilli, D. Lathouwers, J. Kloosterman, T. Van-der-hagen, .. J. Koning et al., Uncertainty quantification for criticality problems using non-intrusive and adaptive Polynomial Chaos techniques, Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol.56, pp.71-80, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.01.009

M. Berveiller, B. Sudret, and M. Lemaitre, Stochastic finite element: a non intrusive approach by regression, Revue europ??enne de m??canique num??rique, vol.15, issue.1-2-3, pp.1-3, 2006.
DOI : 10.3166/remn.15.81-92

G. Blatman and B. Sudret, Sparse polynomial chaos expansions and adaptive stochastic finite elements using a regression approach, Comptes Rendus M??canique, vol.336, issue.6, pp.518-523, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.crme.2008.02.013

A. Doostan and H. Owhadi, A non-adapted sparse approximation of PDEs with stochastic inputs, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.230, issue.8, pp.3015-3034, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.002

J. Peng, J. Hampton, and A. Doostan, A weighted -minimization approach for sparse polynomial chaos expansions, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.267, issue.15, pp.92-111, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.02.024

G. Matheron, Les cahiers du Centre de morphologie mathématique de Fontainebleau, Fascicule, vol.1, 1969.

J. Sacks, W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, and H. P. Wynn, Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Statistical Science, vol.4, issue.4, pp.409-423, 1989.
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1177012413

J. Bect, D. Ginsbourger, L. Li, V. Picheny, and E. Vasquez, Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing, vol.34, issue.4, pp.773-793, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11222-011-9241-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00689580

V. Picheny, D. Ginsbourger, O. Roustant, R. T. Haftka, and N. Kim, Adaptive Designs of Experiments for Accurate Approximation of a Target Region, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.132, issue.7, p.71008, 2010.
DOI : 10.1115/1.4001873
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/emse-00699752

V. Dubourg, B. Sudret, and J. Bourinet, Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol.42, issue.1, pp.673-690, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s00158-011-0653-8
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00587311

D. Jones, M. Schonlau, and W. Welch, Efficient Global Optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global Optimization, vol.13, issue.4, pp.455-492, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008306431147

V. Joseph, A. Sudjianto, and Y. Hung, Blind Kriging: A New Method for Developing Metamodels, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.130, issue.3, pp.31102-31103, 2008.
DOI : 10.1115/1.2829873

J. Berenger, A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.114, issue.2, pp.185-200, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.1994.1159

D. Merewether, R. Fisher, and F. Smith, On Implementing a Numeric Huygen's Source Scheme in a Finite Difference Program to Illuminate Scattering Bodies, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol.27, issue.6, pp.1829-1833, 1980.
DOI : 10.1109/TNS.1980.4331114

R. Holland and J. Williams, Total-Field versus Scattered-Field Finite-Difference Codes: A Comparative Assessment, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol.30, issue.6, pp.4583-4588, 1983.
DOI : 10.1109/TNS.1983.4333175

J. E. Hansen, Spherical Near-Field antenna measurements, 1988.
DOI : 10.1049/PBEW026E

A. Marrel, B. Iooss, F. Van-dorpe, and E. Volkova, An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol.52, issue.10, pp.4731-4744, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.csda.2008.03.026
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00239492

E. Vazquez, Modélisation comportementale de systèmes non-linéaires multivariables par méthodes à noyaux et applications, 2005.

J. Oakley, Estimating percentiles of uncertain computer code outputs, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), vol.14, issue.1, pp.83-93, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9884.00300

M. Abramovitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 1972.

B. Sudret, Uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis in mechanical models ? Contributions to structural reliability and stochastic spectral methods, habilitation à diriger des recherches, 2007.

S. Isukapalli, Uncertainty analysis of transport-transformation models, 1999.

O. Dubrule, Cross validation of kriging in a unique neighborhood, Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, vol.15, issue.6, pp.687-699, 1983.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01033232

F. Bachoc, Cross Validation and Maximum Likelihood estimations of hyper-parameters of Gaussian processes with model misspecification, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol.66, pp.55-69, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.csda.2013.03.016

J. S. Park, Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol.39, issue.1, pp.95-111, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-3758(94)90115-5

G. Wang, Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.125, issue.2, pp.210-220, 2003.
DOI : 10.1115/1.1561044
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1031.200

I. M. Sobol, Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol.55, issue.1-3, pp.271-280, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6

B. Sudret, Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.93, issue.7, pp.964-979, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432217

A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E. M. Scott, Sensitivity analysis, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00386559

M. Morris, T. Mitchell, and D. Ylvisaker, Bayesian Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments: Use of Derivatives in Surface Prediction, Technometrics, vol.15, issue.3, pp.243-255, 1993.
DOI : 10.1080/00401706.1992.10485229

S. Xiong, P. Qian, and C. Wu, Sequential Design and Analysis of High-Accuracy and Low-Accuracy Computer Codes, Technometrics, vol.34, issue.1, pp.37-46, 2013.
DOI : 10.1080/00401706.2012.723572

B. Echard, N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire, AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation, Structural Safety, vol.33, issue.2, pp.145-154, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002

B. Bichon, J. Mcfarland, and S. Mahadevan, Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.96, issue.10, pp.1386-1395, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2011.05.008