Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

Abstract : An argumentation framework is seen as a directed graph whose nodes are arguments and arcs are attacks between the arguments. Acceptable sets of arguments, called extensions, are computed using a semantics. Existing semantics are solely based on the attacks and do not take into account other important criteria like the intrinsic strengths of arguments. The contribution of this paper is three fold. First, we study how preferences issued from differences in strengths of arguments can help in argumentation frameworks. We show that they play two distinct and complementary roles: (i) to repair the attack relation between arguments, (ii) to refine the evaluation of arguments. Despite the importance of both roles, only the first one is tackled in existing literature. In a second part of this paper, we start by showing that existing models that repair the attack relation with preferences do not perform well in certain situations and may return counter-intuitive results. We then propose a new abstract and general framework which treats properly both roles of preferences. The third part of this work is devoted to defining a bridge between the argumentation-based and the coherence-based approaches for handling inconsistency in knowledge bases, in particular when priorities between formulae are available. We focus on two well-known models, namely the preferred sub-theories introduced by Brewka and the demo-preferred sets defined by Cayrol, Royer and Saurel. For each of these models, we provide an instantiation of our abstract framework which is in full correspondence with it.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [43 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (oatao) <>
Submitted on : Thursday, March 5, 2015 - 1:16:06 PM
Last modification on : Sunday, November 22, 2020 - 3:42:06 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, June 6, 2015 - 10:41:31 AM


Files produced by the author(s)



Leila Amgoud, Srdjan Vesic. Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2014, vol. 55 (n° 2), pp. 585-606. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010⟩. ⟨hal-01123723⟩



Record views


Files downloads