Equivalence in Logic-Based Argumentation - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics Année : 2014

Equivalence in Logic-Based Argumentation

Résumé

This paper investigates when two abstract logic-based argumentation systems are equivalent. It defines various equivalence criteria, investigates the links between them, and identifies cases where two systems are equivalent with respect to each of the proposed criteria. In particular, it shows that under some reasonable conditions on the logic underlying an argumentation system, the latter has an equivalent finite subsystem, called core. This core constitutes a threshold under which arguments of the system have not yet attained their final status and consequently adding a new argument may result in status change. From that threshold, the statuses of all arguments become stable.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Amgoud_13082.pdf (315.01 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-01123719 , version 1 (05-03-2015)

Identifiants

Citer

Leila Amgoud, Philippe Besnard, Srdjan Vesic. Equivalence in Logic-Based Argumentation. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 2014, vol. 24 (n° 3), pp. 181-208. ⟨10.1080/11663081.2014.959332⟩. ⟨hal-01123719⟩
117 Consultations
274 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More