First proton???proton collisions at the LHC as observed with??the??ALICE detector: measurement of the charged-particle pseudorapidity density at $\sqrt{s}=900$ ??GeV, The European Physical Journal C, vol.41, issue.1-2, pp.111-125, 1140. ,
DOI : 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1227-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/in2p3-00437986
The future of single-authored papers, Scientometrics, vol.32, issue.3, pp.353-35810, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-007-1822-9
An Overview of the BlueGene/L Supercomputer, ACM/IEEE SC 2002 Conference (SC'02), pp.1-22, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1109/SC.2002.10017
Writing relationships: Collaboration in a faculty writing group, The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2013. ,
Collaborative Authorship in the Journal Literature: Perspectives for Academic Librarians Who Wish to Publish, College & Research Libraries, vol.61, issue.5, pp.61-410, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.5860/crl.61.5.410
Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis, Scientometrics, vol.63, issue.6, pp.15-23, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4
The quality of single and multiple authored papers: An unresolved problem Issues of work-life balance among JASIST authors and editors, Scientometrics Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.21, issue.6410, pp.37-48, 1991. ,
Anchored conversations, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems , CHI '00, pp.454-46110332475, 1145. ,
DOI : 10.1145/332040.332475
Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.280, issue.7, pp.558-569, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asi.1097
The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards, pp.41-70, 2005. ,
Effective use of tables and figures in abstracts, presentations , and papers, Respiratory Care, issue.10, pp.49-1233, 2004. ,
Measuring co-authors??? contribution to an article???s visibility, Scientometrics, vol.87, issue.3, pp.55-67, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-012-0832-4
Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles, Pharmacotherapy, vol.314, issue.6, pp.759-767, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1038/423479a
The grid2003 production grid: principles and practice, Proceedings. 13th IEEE International Symposium on High performance Distributed Computing, 2004., pp.236-24510, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1109/HPDC.2004.1323544
Let's Practice What We Preach, The American Statistician, vol.56, issue.2, pp.121-130, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1198/000313002317572790
Making Data Maximally Available, Science, vol.331, issue.6018, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.1203354
Single Authors Are Not Alone: Colleagues Often Help, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol.34, issue.2, pp.108-113, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.3138/jsp.34.2.108
Refereeing and the single author, Journal of Information Science, vol.31, issue.3, pp.251-256, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0165551505052474
New ways of making academic articles easier to read, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, vol.12, issue.1, pp.143-160, 2012. ,
Working collaboratively: Reflecting on unexpected outcomes, Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, vol.3, issue.2, 2011. ,
Using Graphs Instead of Tables in Political Science, Perspectives on Politics, vol.14, issue.04, pp.755-771, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2291215
What is research collaboration? Research Policy, pp.1-1810, 1997. ,
The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited, Journal of Informetrics, vol.6, issue.4, pp.639-644, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.006
What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons, Scientometrics, vol.63, issue.2, pp.341-356, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-005-0216-0
The effects of new technologies on writing and writing processes, Handbook of writing research, pp.248-263, 2006. ,
How we wrote this book: A PBL approach to collaborative writing, New approaches to problem-based learning, pp.266-278, 2010. ,
Working with coauthors The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing, pp.274-292, 2011. ,
Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Computer Supported Cooperative Work Little science, big science, D.d.S, vol.13, issue.1, pp.63-89, 1963. ,
When Authorship Fails, JAMA, vol.278, issue.7, pp.579-585, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041
Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality, Research Policy, vol.34, issue.6, pp.784-794, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.004
Writing together, How we write: Writing as creative design, pp.168-186, 1999. ,
Does the human capital of teams of natural science authors predict citation frequency? Scientometrics doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1953-z Speck Collaborative writing: An annotated bibliography, pp.525-542, 1999. ,
Graphs and prestige in agricultural journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.57, issue.10, pp.1946-1950, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asi.22868
Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, pp.349-35010, 2002. ,
Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition, Information Systems Research, vol.2, issue.1, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1287/isre.2.1.63
An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing, Journal of Informetrics, vol.6, issue.4, pp.700-711, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008
Deleuzian Thought and Collaborative Writing: A Play in Four Acts, Qualitative Inquiry, vol.10, issue.9, pp.730-741, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1077800410374299
Relation of title length of journal articles to number of authors, Scientometrics, vol.42, issue.1, pp.321-332, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF02017231