Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO-GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models

Abstract : The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite provides robust and global direct measurements of the cloud vertical structure. The GCM-Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product is used to evaluate the simulated clouds in five climate models using a lidar simulator. The total cloud cover is underestimated in all models (51% to 62% vs. 64% in observations) except in the Arctic. Continental cloud covers (at low, mid, high altitudes) are highly variable depending on the model. In the tropics, the top of deep convective clouds varies between 14 and 18km in the models versus 16km in the observations, and all models underestimate the low cloud amount (16% to 25%) compared to observations (29%). In the Arctic, the modeled low cloud amounts (37% to 57%) are slightly biased compared to observations (44%), and the models do not reproduce the observed seasonal variation. © 2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [28 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01113124
Contributor : Denis Roura <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, February 4, 2015 - 2:36:54 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, December 10, 2020 - 12:36:50 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - 10:46:18 AM

File

grl29641.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Citation

G. Cesana, H. Chepfer. How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO-GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models. Geophysical Research Letters, American Geophysical Union, 2012, 39 (20), pp.L20803. ⟨10.1029/2012GL053153⟩. ⟨hal-01113124⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

454

Files downloads

546