K. Saenko, B. Kulis, M. Fritz, and T. Darrell, Adapting Visual Category Models to New Domains, Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Computer vision: Part IV, ECCV'10, pp.213-226, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15561-1_16

S. J. Pan and Q. Yang, A Survey on Transfer Learning, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.22, issue.10, pp.1345-1359, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191

Y. Mansour, M. Mohri, and A. Rostamizadeh, Domain adaptation: Learning bounds and algorithms, COLT'09, pp.19-30, 2009.

S. Ben-david, T. Lu, T. Luu, and D. Pl, Impossibility theorems for domain adaptation, AISTATS, pp.129-136, 2010.

P. Germain, A. Habrard, F. Laviolette, and E. Morvant, A PAC-Bayesian Approach for Domain Adaptation with Specialization to Linear Classifiers, ICML, pp.738-746, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00822685

N. Courty, R. Flamary, and D. Tuia, Domain Adaptation with Regularized Optimal Transport, European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD), 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-44848-9_18

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01018698

B. Kulis, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell, What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms, CVPR 2011, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995702

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.294.2663

I. Jhuo, D. Liu, D. T. Lee, and S. Chang, Robust visual domain adaptation with low-rank reconstruction, CVPR, pp.2168-2175, 2012.

J. Hoffman, E. Rodner, J. Donahue, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell, Efficient learning of domain invariant image representations, ICLR, 2013.

J. Ham, D. Lee, and L. Saul, Semisupervised alignment of manifolds, 10th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.120-127, 2005.

C. Wang and S. Mahadevan, Heterogeneous domain adaptation using manifold alignment, IJCAI, pp.1541-1546, 2011.

H. Daumé and I. , Frustratingly easy domain adaptation, Ann. Meeting of the Assoc. Computational Linguistics, 2007.

S. J. Pan and Q. Yang, Domain Adaptation via Transfer Component Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol.22, issue.2, pp.199-210, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TNN.2010.2091281

URL : http://c2inet.sce.ntu.edu.sg/ivor/publication/tca_tnn.pdf

A. Kumar, H. Daumé, I. , and D. Jacobs, Generalized multiview analysis: A discriminative latent space, CVPR, 2012.

C. Wang and S. Mahadevan, Manifold alignment without correspondence, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2009.
DOI : 10.1201/b11431-6

R. Gopalan, R. Li, and R. Chellappa, Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.999-1006, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126344

B. Gong, Y. Shi, F. Sha, and K. Grauman, Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation, CVPR, pp.2066-2073, 2012.

J. Zheng, M. Liu, R. Chellappa, and P. J. Phillips, A grassmann manifold-based domain adaptation approach, ICPR, pp.2095-2099, 2012.

T. S. Caetano, T. Caelli, D. Schuurmans, and D. A. Barone, Graphical Models and Point Pattern Matching, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.28, issue.10, pp.1646-1663, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.207

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.113.7197

T. Caetano, J. J. Mcauley, L. Cheng, Q. V. Le, and A. J. Smola, Learning graph matching, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, issue.6, pp.311048-1058, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/tpami.2009.28

URL : http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2890

S. Ben-david, J. Blitzer, K. Crammer, A. Kulesza, F. Pereira et al., A theory of learning from different domains, Machine Learning, pp.151-175, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s10994-009-5152-4

L. Kantorovich, On the Translocation of Masses, Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol.133, issue.4, pp.199-201, 1942.
DOI : 10.1007/s10958-006-0049-2

S. Ferradans, N. Papadakis, J. Rabin, G. Peyré, and J. Aujol, Regularized discrete optimal transport, Scale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision, SSVM, pp.428-439, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00797078

M. Cuturi, Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transportation, NIPS, pp.2292-2300

P. Knight, The Sinkhorn???Knopp Algorithm: Convergence and Applications, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol.30, issue.1, pp.261-275, 2008.
DOI : 10.1137/060659624

E. J. Candes, M. B. Wakin, and S. P. Boyd, Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ??? 1 Minimization, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, vol.7, issue.3, pp.877-905, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x

D. R. Hunter and K. Lange, A Tutorial on MM Algorithms. The American Statistician, pp.30-38, 2004.

G. Obozinski, B. Taskar, I. Michael, and . Jordan, Joint covariate selection and joint subspace selection for multiple classification problems, Statistics and Computing, vol.8, issue.68, pp.231-252, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11222-008-9111-x

A. Rakotomamonjy, R. Flamary, G. Gasso, and S. Canu, <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">$\ell_{p}-\ell_{q}$</tex></formula> Penalty for Sparse Linear and Sparse Multiple Kernel Multitask Learning, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol.22, issue.8, pp.1307-1320, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TNN.2011.2157521

G. Griffin, A. Holub, and P. Perona, Caltech-256 Object Category Dataset, 2007.

K. Zhang, V. W. Zheng, Q. Wang, J. T. Kwok, Q. Yang et al., Covariate shift in Hilbert space: A solution via surrogate kernels, ICML, 2013.

M. Sugiyama, S. Nakajima, H. Kashima, P. V. Buenau, and M. Kawanabe, Direct importance estimation with model selection and its application to covariate shift adaptation, NIPS, 2008.