V. Aghababian and T. A. Nazir, Developing Normal Reading Skills: Aspects of the Visual Processes Underlying Word Recognition, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol.76, issue.2, pp.123-150, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/jecp.1999.2540

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00653781

B. Boutayab and N. , Interactions des facteurs visuels et lexicaux au cours de la reconnaissance des mots écrits, 2004.

H. Bouma, Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition, Nature, vol.70, issue.5241, pp.177-178, 1970.
DOI : 10.1038/226177a0

M. Brysbaert, Interhemispheric transfer in reading, 1992.

M. Brysbaert, Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli, Behavioural Brain Research, vol.64, issue.1-2, pp.151-161, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90127-9

M. Brysbaert, The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: A factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception, Brain and Language, vol.88, issue.3, pp.259-267, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00279-7

M. Brysbaert, D. Drieghe, and F. Vitu, Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading, Cognitive Processes in Eye Guidance
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198566816.003.0003

M. Brysbaert, S. Grondelaers, and E. Ratinckx, Sentence reading: Do we make use of orthographic cues in homophones?, Acta Psychologica, vol.105, issue.1, pp.31-56, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00047-0

M. Brysbaert, F. Vitu, and W. Schroyens, The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition., Neuropsychology, vol.10, issue.3, pp.385-395, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0894-4105.10.3.385

D. Drieghe and M. Brysbaert, Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.28, issue.5, pp.951-961, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.28.5.951

M. Farid and J. Grainger, How Initial Fixation Position Influences Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of French and Arabic, Brain and Language, vol.53, issue.3, pp.351-368, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/brln.1996.0053

J. Grainger and C. Whitney, Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Science, pp.58-59, 2004.

M. W. Harm and M. S. Seidenberg, Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor Between Visual and Phonological Processes., Psychological Review, vol.111, issue.3, pp.662-720, 2004.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662

A. W. Inhoff, C. Connine, B. Eiter, R. Radach, and D. Heller, Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.36, issue.2, pp.320-325, 2004.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03196577

M. L. Kelly, M. W. Jones, S. A. Mcdonald, and R. C. Shillcock, Dyslexics??? eye fixations may accommodate to hemispheric desynchronization, NeuroReport, vol.15, issue.17, pp.2629-2632, 2004.
DOI : 10.1097/00001756-200412030-00014

S. Knecht, B. Drager, M. Deppe, L. Bobe, H. Lohmann et al., Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans, Brain, vol.123, issue.12, pp.2512-2518, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/brain/123.12.2512

M. Lavidor and V. Walsh, Magnetic stimulation studies of foveal representation, Brain and Language, vol.88, issue.3, pp.331-338, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00167-6

A. Leff, A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing, Brain and Language, vol.88, issue.3, pp.268-278, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00161-5

S. A. Mcdonald and R. C. Shillcock, The implications of foveal splitting for saccade planning in reading, Vision Research, vol.45, issue.6, pp.801-820, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.002

P. Monaghan, R. Shillcock, and S. Mcdonald, Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing, Brain and Language, vol.88, issue.3, pp.339-354, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00165-2

T. A. Nazir, Traces of Print Along the Visual Pathway, Reading as a perceptual process, pp.3-22, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50003-6

T. A. Nazir, N. Ben-boutayab, N. Decoppet, A. Deutsch, and R. Frost, Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words, Brain and Language, vol.88, issue.3, pp.294-311, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00168-8

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00653793

T. A. Nazir and J. K. O-'regan, Some results on translation invariance in the human visual system, Spatial Vision, vol.5, issue.2, pp.81-100, 1990.
DOI : 10.1163/156856890X00011

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01088058

T. A. Nazir, J. K. O-'regan, and A. M. Jacobs, On words and their letters, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.47, issue.2, pp.171-174, 1991.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03335227

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01088078

O. 'regan and J. K. , The convenient viewing position hypothesis, Eye movements, cognition, and visual perception, pp.289-298, 1981.

O. 'regan, J. K. Lévy-schoen, A. Pynte, J. Brugaillère, and B. , Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.10, issue.2, pp.250-257, 1984.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.10.2.250

M. Perea and S. J. Lupker, Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.51, issue.2, pp.231-246, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005

J. Pynte, A. Kennedy, and W. Murray, Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: Time course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.17, issue.2, pp.458-470, 1991.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.458

D. Schatschneider, J. M. Fletcher, D. J. Francis, C. D. Carlson, and B. R. Foorman, Kindergarten Prediction of Reading Skills: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis., Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.96, issue.2, pp.265-282, 2004.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265

R. Shillcock, T. M. Ellison, and P. Monaghan, Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model., Psychological Review, vol.107, issue.4, pp.824-851, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.824

M. Stevens and J. Grainger, Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.8, issue.1, pp.133-151, 2003.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03194790

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01441341

F. Vitu, J. K. O-'regan, and M. Mittau, Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.36, issue.1, pp.583-600, 1990.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03203111

T. Wertheim, Uber die indirekte Sehschärfe, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, vol.7, p.172, 1894.

C. Whitney, Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access, Brain and Language, vol.88, issue.3, pp.279-293, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00160-3