HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Testing OWL Axioms against RDF Facts: A Possibilistic Approach

Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi 1 Catherine Faron Zucker 1 Fabien Gandon 1
1 WIMMICS - Web-Instrumented Man-Machine Interactions, Communities and Semantics
CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée , Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS - Scalable and Pervasive softwARe and Knowledge Systems
Abstract : Automatic knowledge base enrichment methods rely criti-cally on candidate axiom scoring. The most popular scoring heuristics proposed in the literature are based on statistical inference. We argue that such a probability-based framework is not always completely satis-factory and propose a novel, alternative scoring heuristics expressed in terms of possibility theory, whereby a candidate axiom receives a bipolar score consisting of a degree of possibility and a degree of necessity. We evaluate our proposal by applying it to the problem of testing SubClassOf axioms against the DBpedia RDF dataset.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [14 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 11:44:43 AM
Last modification on : Sunday, May 1, 2022 - 3:15:40 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, April 14, 2017 - 8:16:21 PM


Files produced by the author(s)




Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi, Catherine Faron Zucker, Fabien Gandon. Testing OWL Axioms against RDF Facts: A Possibilistic Approach. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - 19th International Conference, EKAW 2014, Linköping, Sweden, November 24-28, 2014. Proceedings, Nov 2014, Linköping, Sweden. pp.519 - 530, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-13704-9_39⟩. ⟨hal-01084444⟩



Record views


Files downloads