In Case of Interval (or More General) Uncertainty, No Algorithm Can Choose the Simplest Representative - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Reliable Computing Année : 2002

In Case of Interval (or More General) Uncertainty, No Algorithm Can Choose the Simplest Representative

Résumé

When we only know the interval of possible values of a certain quantity (or a more general set of possible values), it is desirable to characterize this interval by supplying the user with the ''simplest'' element from this interval, and by characterizing how different from this value we can get. For example, if, for some unknown physical quantity $x$, measurements result in the interval $[1.95,2.1]$ of possible values, then, most probably, the physicist will publish this result as $y\approx 2$. Similarly, a natural representation of the measurement result $x\in [3.141592,3.141593]$ is $x\approx \pi$. In this paper, we show that the problem of choosing the simplest element from a given interval (or from a given set) is, in general, not algorithmically solvable.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01072724 , version 1 (08-10-2014)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01072724 , version 1

Citer

Gerhard Heindl, Vladik Kreinovich, Maria Rifqi. In Case of Interval (or More General) Uncertainty, No Algorithm Can Choose the Simplest Representative. Reliable Computing, 2002, 8 (3), pp.213-227. ⟨hal-01072724⟩
149 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More