T. Bénatouïl, A Tale of Two Sociologies: The Critical and the Pragmatic Stance in Contemporary French Sociology, European Journal of Social Theory, vol.2, issue.3, pp.379-396, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/136843199002003011

D. and L. Formation-des-valeurs, Présentation

A. Blok, Pragmatic sociology as political ecology: On the many worths of nature(s), European Journal of Social Theory, vol.16, issue.4, pp.492-510, 2013.
DOI : 10.1177/1368431013479688

P. Blokker, Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application, European Journal of Social Theory, vol.2, issue.3, pp.251-261, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/1368431011412344

B. Luc and E. Chiapello, The New Spirit of Capitalism, Verso [Primeira edição francesa: Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme, 1999.

B. Luc and L. Thévenot, On Justification: Economies of Worth, 2006.

J. De-la, Les Economies de la grandeur Paris, 1991.

M. Breviglieri, UN ESSAI D???APPROFONDISSEMENT SOCIOLOGIQUE DE L???ANTHROPOLOGIE CAPACITAIRE DE PAUL RICOEUR, Études Ricoeuriennes, pp.34-52, 2012.
DOI : 10.5195/ERRS.2012.134

M. Callon, P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe, Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00422009

L. Centemeri, The Contribution of the Sociology of Quantification to a Discussion of Objectivity in Economics, José Castro Caldas e Vitor Neves Facts and Values in Economics, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01016061

R. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, vol.1, 1960.

F. Agostino, Incommensurability and commensuration: lessons from (and to) ethico-political theory, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol.31, issue.3, pp.429-447, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00013-3

A. Desrosières, How to Make Things Which Hold Together: Social Science, Statistics and the State, Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, 1990.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-585-29174-1_8

A. Desrosières, Chapitre 5. Discuter l???indiscutable??: raison statistique et espace public, Pouvoir et légitimité : figures de l'espace public, 1992.
DOI : 10.4000/books.pressesmines.913

J. Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology, 1922.
DOI : 10.1037/14663-000

N. Dodier, Review Article: Action as a Combination of ???Common Worlds???, The Sociological Review, vol.41, issue.3, pp.556-71, 1993.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00077.x

E. Doidy, La voix des usagers dans les concertations environnementales, Sociologies pratiques, pp.49-64, 2003.

N. E. Eliasoph and P. Lichterman, Culture in Interaction, American Journal of Sociology, vol.108, issue.4, pp.735-794, 2003.
DOI : 10.1086/367920

W. N. Espeland, L. Mitchell, and . Stevens, Commensuration as a Social Process, Annual Review of Sociology, vol.24, issue.1, pp.313-343, 1998.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313

M. Guggenheim and J. Potthast, Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between Actor-Network theory and the sociology of critical capacities, European Journal of Social Theory, vol.15, issue.2, pp.157-178, 2012.
DOI : 10.1177/1368431011423601

M. Harvey, Drama, Talk, and Emotion: Omitted Aspects of Public Participation, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.34, issue.2, pp.139-161, 2009.
DOI : 10.1177/0162243907309632

A. Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, 1995.

T. Ingold, The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, 2000.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203466025

S. Jasanoff, Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science, Minerva, vol.41, issue.3, pp.223-244, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-322-80692-5_17

H. Joas, The Creativity of Action, 1996.

H. Joas, The Genesis of Values, 2000.

C. E. Lafaye and L. Thévenot, Une justification ecologique?: Conflits dans l'amenagement de la nature, Revue Fran??aise de Sociologie, vol.34, issue.4, pp.495-524, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/3321928

M. Lamont, Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation, Annual Review of Sociology, vol.38, issue.1, pp.201-221, 2012.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022

B. Latour, To modernise or ecologise? That is the question, Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium, 1998.

S. Lukes, Comparing the Incomparable: Trade-offs and Sacrifices, Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason, 1997.

M. Nussbaum, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511817915

S. Pink, Doing sensory ethnography, 2009.
DOI : 10.4135/9781446249383

T. M. Porter, Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, 1995.

M. Radin, Compensation and Commensurability, Duke Law Journal, vol.43, issue.1, pp.56-86, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/1372746

J. Raz, The Morality of Freedom, 1986.
DOI : 10.1093/0198248075.001.0001

A. Richard-ferroudji, Limites du mod??le d??lib??ratif??: composer avec diff??rents formats de participation, Politix, vol.96, issue.4, pp.161-181, 2011.
DOI : 10.3917/pox.096.0161

I. F. Silber, Pragmatic Sociology as Cultural Sociology, European Journal of Social Theory, vol.6, issue.4, pp.427-476, 2003.
DOI : 10.1177/13684310030064004

D. Stark, The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life, 2009.
DOI : 10.1515/9781400831005

J. Stavo-debauge, La sociologie dite 'pragmatique' et la philosophie pragmatiste, une rencontre tardive Pourquoi le pragmatisme? L'intérêt du pragmatisme pour les sciences humaines et sociales, pp.15-18, 2012.

L. Thévenot, Rules and implements: investment in forms, Social Science Information, vol.23, issue.1, pp.1-45, 1984.
DOI : 10.1177/053901884023001001

L. Thévenot, L'action qui convient, Les formes de l'action, 1990.

L. Thévenot, The Plurality of Cognitive Formats and Engagements: Moving between the Familiar and the Public, European Journal of Social Theory, vol.10, issue.3, pp.413-440, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/1368431007080703

J. Thibaud, The sensory fabric of urban ambiances The senses & societies, pp.203-215, 2011.

F. Vatin, Valuation as Evaluating and Valorizing, Valuation Studies, vol.1, issue.1, 2013.
DOI : 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01154593

P. Wagner, After Justification: Repertoires of Evaluation and the Sociology of Modernity, European Journal of Social Theory, vol.2, issue.3, pp.341-57, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/13684319922224572

V. A. Zelizer and N. J. , The Social Meaning of Money, 1997.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470755679.ch17

P. Beria and A. B. Scholz, Strategies and pitfalls in the infrastructure development of airports: A comparison of Milan Malpensa and Berlin Brandenburg International airports, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.16, issue.2, pp.65-73, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2009.10.004

L. Bifulco and O. De-leonardis, Sulle tracce dell'azione pubblica, Le politiche sociali. Temi e prospettive emergenti, 2005.

L. Bobbio, Discutibile e indiscussa. L'Alta Velocità alla prova della democrazia, Il Mulino, vol.55, issue.423, pp.124-132, 2006.

L. Boltanski and L. Thévenot, De la justification, Paris: Gallimard (Eng. Tr, 1991.

M. Callon, An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology The Laws of the Markets, pp.244-269, 1998.

L. Caruso, Il territorio della politica. La nuova partecipazione di massa nei movimenti. No Tav e, No Dal Molin, 2010.

L. Centemeri, The Contribution of the Sociology of Quantification to a Discussion of Objectivity in Economics, Castro Caldas J. et Neves V. (éds.), Facts and Values in Economics, pp.110-125, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01016061

L. Centemeri, What orders of worth don't say about why the environment is valuable to us. Environmental valuation, 'constitutive incommensurability' and the 'vertical pluralism' of regimes of engagement, Proceedings of the 36 Kongress Des Deutschen Gesellschaft Fur Soziologie, pp.1-5, 2013.

D. Porta, D. Piazza, and G. , Le ragioni del no. Le campagne contro la TAV in Val di Susa e il Ponte sullo Stretto, 2008.

E. Doidy, La voix des usagers dans les concertations environnementales, Sociologies pratiques, pp.49-64, 2003.

J. Dziedzicki, II. La gestion des conflits d'am??nagement entre participation du public et m??diation, Annuaire des collectivités locales, pp.635-646, 2003.
DOI : 10.3406/coloc.2003.1662

E. J. Feldman, Air Transportation Infrastructure as a Problem of Public Policy, Policy Studies Journal, vol.6, issue.1, pp.20-29, 1977.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1977.tb01162.x

T. Ingold, The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, 2000.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203466025

S. Jasanoff and K. , Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva, vol.10, issue.1, p.161, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

K. W. Kapp, The Social Costs of Private Enterprise, 1950.

T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1970.

C. Lafaye and L. Thévenot, Une justification ecologique?: Conflits dans l'amenagement de la nature, Revue Fran??aise de Sociologie, vol.34, issue.4, pp.495-524, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/3321928

S. Laugier, Tous vulnérables ? L'éthique du care, les animaux et l'environnement, 2012.

S. J. Liebowitz and S. E. Margolis, Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History, SSRN Electronic Journal, issue.11, pp.205-226, 1995.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1706450

M. Maggiolini, Una linea tra conflitto e progetto. L'Osservatorio sulla linea ferroviaria Torino ? Lione, 2012.

A. Magnaghi, Il progetto locale. Verso la coscienza di luogo, 2010.

L. Pellizzoni, Dalla retta alla spezzata. Il ruolo dell'expertise nei conflitti ambientali, Dalla proposta alla protesta, e ritorno. Conflitti locali e innovazione politica, 2011.

N. Podestà and T. Vitale, Territori e innovazione politica: successi e fallimenti dell'azione conflittuale, Dalla proposta alla protesta, e ritorno. Conflitti locali e innovazione politica, 2011.

. Le, (contre)exemple de l'action publique européenne, dir.) La liberté au prisme des capacités. Amartya Sen au-delà du libéralisme, pp.297-326

M. Álvarez, A. ;. Moreno, and C. Mataix, The analytic hierarchy process to support decision-making processes in infrastructure projects with social impact, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol.19, issue.2004, pp.1-11, 2012.
DOI : 10.1080/14783360500163243

S. Arnstein, A Ladder Of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, vol.35, issue.4, pp.216-224, 1969.
DOI : 10.1080/01944366908977225

R. Schmalensee, V. Smith, . Kerry, and R. N. Stavins, Is there a role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?, Science, vol.272, pp.221-222, 1996.

K. Bäckstrand, Civic Science for Sustainability, Global Environmental Politics, vol.3, issue.4, pp.24-41, 2003.
DOI : 10.1215/9780822393849-030

U. Beck, Risk Society, 1992.
DOI : 10.4135/9781412952552.n244
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00795250

S. Bento, . Pinho, . Coutinho, and C. Borrego, SIG na avaliação de alternativas para a localização do Novo Aeroporto de Lisboa, Actas do X Encontro de Utilizadores de Informação Geográfica. Oeiras: Associação de Utilizadores de Informação Geográfica, pp.547-557, 2008.

J. D. Bransford and A. L. Brown, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, 2000.

N. ;. Bruzelius, . Flyvberg, . Burt, and W. Rothengatter, Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects, Transport Policy, vol.9, issue.2, pp.143-154, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00014-8

M. Callon, The Laws of the Markets, p.205, 1998.

M. Callon, . Lascoumes, . Pierre, and Y. Barthe, Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique, 2001.

. Coutinho, M. Partidário, and . Do-rosário, História de um processo de decisão: o novo aeroporto de Lisboa, paper apresentado na CNAI'08|3ª, Conferência Nacional de Impactes. Beja, 22 a 24 de outubro, 2008.

A. C. Costa and J. Rodrigues, O nexo comensurabilidademercadorização e as limitações da análise custo-benefício como guia para a ação dos poderes públicos, Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, vol.83, pp.141-163, 2008.

D. Sesto and L. Steven, Uses of Knowledge and Values in Technical Controversies: The Case of Nuclear Reactor Safety in the US, Social Studies of Science, vol.13, issue.3, pp.395-416, 1983.
DOI : 10.1177/030631283013003003

W. Espeland, . Nelson, . Stevens, and L. Mitchell, Commensuration as a Social Process, Annual Review of Sociology, vol.24, issue.1, pp.313-343, 1998.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313

N. Fairclough, Critical discourses analysis: The critical Study of Language, 2010.

K. T. Frick, The Cost of Technological Sublime: Daring ingenuity and the new San Francisco-Oakland and Bay bridge Bent Flyvbjerg e Bert van Wee, Decision-Making on Mega-Projects. Cost Benefit analysis, Planning and Innovation, Hugo Priemus, pp.239-262, 2008.

S. ;. Funtowicz and J. Ravetz, A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, pp.137-152, 1991.

K. Furlong, Small technologies, big change: Rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography, Progress in Human Geography, vol.35, issue.4, pp.1-23, 2010.
DOI : 10.1177/0309132510380488

R. N. Giere, Controversies involving science and technology: a theoretical perspective, Scientific controversies, pp.121-50, 1987.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511628719.006

M. Gonçalves and . Eduarda, Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol.22, issue.3, pp.249-269, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00005-7

M. Gonçalves and . Eduarda, Delicado, Ana, Os portugueses e os novos riscos, 2007.

P. Hines, The dynamics of scientific controversies, AgBioForum, vol.4, issue.3&4, pp.186-193, 2001.

A. Irwin, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development, 1995.

S. Jasanoff, Designs of Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, 2007.
DOI : 10.1515/9781400837311

S. ;. Jasanoff, . Kim, and . Sang-hyun, Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva, vol.10, issue.1, pp.119-146, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

S. Jasanoff, Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies, Science as Culture, vol.22, issue.1, pp.189-196, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

B. Jessop, Cultural political economy and critical policy studies, Critical Policy Studies, vol.8, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb00520.x

G. A. Kiker, T. S. Bridges, . Varghese, . Arun, . Seager et al., Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, p.207, 2005.

Z. Konopásek, . Stockelova, . Tereza, and L. Zamykalová, Making Pure Science and Pure Politics: On the Expertise of Bypass and the Bypass of Expertise, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.33, issue.4, pp.529-553, 2008.
DOI : 10.1177/0162243907306699

B. Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, 2003.

B. Latour, Politics of Nature. How to bring sciences into democracy, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01024236

R. Layard and S. Glaister, Introduction, 1994.

. Glaister, Cost-Benefit Analysis, pp.1-58

L. ;. Levidow and T. Papaioannou, State imaginaries of the public good: shaping UK innovation priorities for bioenergy, Environmental Science & Policy, vol.30, pp.36-49, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.008

C. Lockhart, Controversy in Environmental Policy Decisions: Conflicting Policy Means or Rival Ends?, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.26, issue.3, pp.259-277, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/016224390102600301

A. Mazur, Dispute between experts, Minerva, XI, issue.2, pp.245-254, 1973.

A. Mazur, The dynamics of technical controversy, 1981.

H. S. Mather, Law and incommensurability, McGill Law Journal, vol.47, pp.345-388, 2002.

J. Mcdonald, I agree, but?: Finding alternatives to controversial projects through public deliberation, Christian Kock e Lisa S. Villadsen 208, 2012.

E. Mcmullin, Scientific controversy and its termination, Scientific controversies, pp.49-91, 1987.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511628719.004

G. Munda, Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2

D. Nelkin, Scientists in an Environmental Controversy, Social Studies of Science, vol.1, issue.3-4, pp.245-261, 1971.
DOI : 10.1177/030631277100100301

D. Nelkin, The Political Impact of Technical Expertise, Social Studies of Science, vol.5, issue.1, pp.35-54, 1975.
DOI : 10.1177/030631277500500103

D. Nelkin, Controversy: politics of technical decisions, 1984.

M. Nussbaum, The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits of Cost???Benefit Analysis, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.29, issue.S2, pp.1005-1036, 2000.
DOI : 10.1086/468103

M. Partidário and . Rosário, Guia de Boas Práticas para Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica ? orientações metodológicas, Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente, 2007.

H. Richardson, Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy, 2002.

G. ;. Rowe and L. J. Frewer, Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.29, issue.4, pp.512-556, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/0162243903259197

G. ;. Rowe and L. J. Frewer, A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.30, issue.2, pp.88-121, 2005.
DOI : 10.1177/0162243904271724

A. Sen, The Discipline of Cost???Benefit Analysis, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.29, issue.S2, pp.873-912, 2000.
DOI : 10.1086/468100

S. Cass and R. , Incommensurability and valuation in law, Michigan Law Review, vol.22, pp.779-861, 1994.

C. R. Sunstein, Incommensurability and Valuation in Law, Free Markets and Social Justice, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/1289693

J. S. Szyliowlcz and A. R. Goetz, Getting realistic about megaproject planning: The case of the new Denver International Airport, Policy Sciences, vol.25, issue.4, pp.347-367, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01000249

. Van-eemeren, . Frans, and B. Garssen, Controversy and Confrontation. Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, 2008.

L. Velho and P. Velho, A controvérsia sobre o uso de alimentação alternativa no combate à subnutrição no Brasil, pp.125-57, 2002.

R. ;. Vreeker, . Nijkamp, and C. Peter-;-ter-welle, A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol.7, issue.1, pp.27-47, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00005-9

T. Webler and S. Tuler, Unlocking the Puzzle of Public Participation, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol.22, issue.3, pp.179-189, 2002.
DOI : 10.1177/02767602022003002

D. Wiggins, Incommensurability: Four Proposals, Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, 1997.

B. ;. Wynne and U. Felt, Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Chair and Rapporteur, p.210, 2007.

. Governance, Brussels: European Commission D-G Research, Science Economy and Society Directorate