Quantitative risk and optimal design approaches in the snow avalanche field: Review and extensions
Résumé
Standard engineering procedures, such as adopting high return periods as reference events, are a simplified means of handling the complex and multivariate nature of snow avalanches. Furthermore, such methods do not explicitly take into account the elements at risk and/or possible budgetary constraints. In recent years, many authors from a variety of fields have tried to overcome these limitations with quantitative risk evaluations including cost-benefit analyses. Their proposals are based on different modelling assumptions, and often on different definitions for certain important concepts including scenarios, vulnerability relations and time effects. The first goal of this paper is to propose a state of the art, and to discuss the common points, advantages and drawbacks of the various proposals within a unified formal framework based on decision theory. Most of the applications already in use concern long term risk assessment in land use planning and traffic road regulation, but some potential also exists for short term problems including risk assessment to back-country skiing. In a second time, new extensions of a simple decisional model for the optimal design of an avalanche dam are proposed to illustrate the key point of the place of uncertainty in risk analyses. Finally, to stimulate further research efforts, other important outlooks including computational issues, multivariate optimal design and measures of risk alternative to the standard expected loss minimisation are discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. rights reserved.
Mots clés
Optimal design
Snow avalanche risk analysis
Vulnerability
Formal risk framework
Risk zoning
CASE-STUDY GALTUR
CLIMATE-CHANGE
VULNERABILITY RELATIONS
PROBABILISTIC APPROACH
TEMPORAL VARIABILITY
REINFORCED-CONCRETE BUILDINGS
IMPACT PRESSURE
FRAGILITY ANALYSIS
RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS
Decision theory
SWITZERLAND
Uncertainty