M. Aramaki and R. Kronland-martinet, Analysissynthesis of impact sounds by real-time dynamic filtering. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol.14, pp.695-705, 2006.

M. Aramaki, C. Gondre, R. Kronland-martinet, T. Voinier, and S. Ystad, Thinking the sounds: an intuitive control of an impact sound synthesizer, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Auditory Display, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00463368

M. Aramaki, M. Besson, R. Kronland-martinet, and S. Ystad, Controlling the Perceived Material in an Impact Sound Synthesizer, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol.19, issue.2, pp.301-314, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TASL.2010.2047755
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00465085

W. W. Gaver, How Do We Hear in the World? Explorations in Ecological Acoustics, Ecological Psychology, vol.18, issue.4, pp.285-313, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.704

K. Van-den-doel, P. G. Kry, and D. K. Pai, FoleyAutomatic, Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques , SIGGRAPH '01, pp.537-544, 2001.
DOI : 10.1145/383259.383322

S. E. Mcadams and E. Bigand, Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition, Oxford Science Publication. Chapter, vol.6, 1993.

W. W. Gaver, What in the World Do We Hear?: An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception, Ecological Psychology, vol.19, issue.1, pp.1-29, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.704

C. F. Michaels and C. Carello, Direct perception, 1981.

W. H. Warren and R. R. Verbrugge, Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: A case study in ecological acoustics., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.10, issue.5, pp.704-712, 1984.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.704

J. Xiao, P. Borgnat, and P. Flandrin, Testing stationarity with time-frequency surrogates, Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference 23, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ensl-00175965