A. Bleske-rechek, L. Nelson, J. Baker, M. Remiker, and S. Brandt, Evolution and the trolley problem: People save five over one unless the one is young, genetically related, or a romantic partner., Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, vol.4, issue.3, pp.115-127, 2010.
DOI : 10.1037/h0099295

N. Chater, The Search for Simplicity: A Fundamental Cognitive Principle?, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.49, issue.2, pp.273-302, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1976.tb01524.x

N. Chater and P. Vitányi, Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.7, issue.1, pp.19-22, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00005-0

F. Cushman, L. Young, and M. Hauser, The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm, Psychological Science, vol.292, issue.12, pp.1082-1089, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x

J. Decety, K. J. Michalska, and K. D. Kinzler, The Developmental Neuroscience of Moral Sensitivity, Emotion Review, vol.17, issue.3, pp.305-307, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/1754073911402373

J. Dessalles, Coincidences and the encounter problem: A formal account, Proceedings of the 30 th annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp.2134-2139, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00601487

J. Dessalles, La pertinence et ses origines cognitives : nouvelles théories, 2008.

J. D. Greene and J. Haidt, How (and where) does moral judgment work?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.6, issue.12, pp.517-523, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9

J. D. Greene, L. E. Nystrom, A. D. Engell, J. M. Darley, and J. D. Cohen, The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment, Neuron, vol.44, issue.2, pp.44-389, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027

J. Haidt, The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology, Science, vol.316, issue.5827, pp.998-1002, 2007.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1137651

J. Haidt and M. A. Hersh, Sexual Morality: The Cultures and Emotions of Conservatives and Liberals1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol.56, issue.1, pp.191-221, 2001.
DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1227

T. M. Jones, Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model, The Academy of Management Review, vol.16, issue.2, pp.366-395, 1991.

M. Koenigs, L. Young, R. Adolphs, D. Tranel, F. Cushman et al., Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements, Nature, vol.5, issue.7138, pp.908-911, 2007.
DOI : 10.1038/nature05631

L. Kohlberg, J. Moll, R. Oliveira-souza, and . De, The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16 Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, issue.8, pp.11-319, 1958.

J. Moll, R. Oliveira-souza, . De, P. J. Eslinger, I. E. Bramati et al., The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions, The Journal of Neuroscience, issue.7, pp.22-2730, 2002.

N. R. Norrick, Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk, 2000.
DOI : 10.1075/cilt.203

B. Rimé, Le partage social desémotionsdes´desémotions, 2005.

S. Roeser, The role of emotions in judging the moral acceptability of risks, Safety Science, vol.44, issue.8, pp.689-700, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.02.001

S. Schnall, J. Haidt, G. L. Clore, and A. H. Jordan, Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.16, issue.8, pp.34-1096, 2008.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167208317771

J. J. Thomson, The Trolley Problem, The Yale Law Journal, vol.94, issue.6, pp.1395-1415, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/796133

P. Valdesolo and D. Desteno, Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment, Psychological Science, vol.17, issue.6, pp.476-477, 2006.
DOI : 10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814

T. Wheatley and J. Haidt, Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe, Psychological Science, vol.2, issue.10, pp.780-784, 2005.
DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.45.3.513