Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.30, issue.6, pp.493-517, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.aos.2004.07.001
Simulation-Based Comparison of Existent IAS 19 Accounting Options, European Accounting Review, vol.5, issue.2, pp.243-276, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
The Many Challenges of Pension Accounting, Accounting Perspectives, vol.21, issue.3, pp.91-111, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1506/ap.8.2.1
Issues affecting the development of an international accounting standard on financial instruments, Advances in accounting,incorporating Advances in international accounting, pp.97-107, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.adiac.2010.03.002
Investigating international accounting standard setting: The black box of IFRS 6, Research in Accounting Regulation, vol.22, issue.2, pp.87-95, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.racreg.2010.07.003
Comptabilisation des écarts actuariels, mise en perspective des pratiques françaises. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion -direction et gestion des entreprises Septembre- Decembre, pp.245-246, 2010. ,
Adoption of ias 19 by europe's premier listed companies: Corridor approach versus full recognition: Summary of an acca research monograph Journal of international accounting, pp.113-122, 2008. ,
The iasb standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users. The british accounting review, pp.42-103, 2010. ,
Pension accounting and research: A review, Accounting and Business Research, vol.1, issue.3, pp.273-311, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1080/00014788.2008.9663336
Perceptions and Misperceptions Regarding the Unqualified Auditor's Report by Financial Statement Preparers, Users, and Auditors, Accounting Horizons, vol.25, issue.4, pp.659-684, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2308/acch-50060
Letters to the shaeholders: A content analysis comparison of letter written by ceos in the united states and japan. The international journal of accounting, pp.45-275, 2010. ,
Amendments to ias 19 employee benefits : Project summary and feedback statement Due process handbook What drives firms' decisions to lobby and determinants of their lobbying positions: Evidence from firms' comment letter submissions during the fasb's stock option expensing proposal, IFRS foundation, pp.46-47, 2004. ,
An examination of comment letters to the iasc: Special purpose entities Research in accounting regulation, pp.27-46, 2008. ,
Transparency of financial statement: A conceptual framework from a user perspective, The journal of american academy of business, vol.9, issue.1, pp.47-51, 2006. ,
Actuarial Gains and Losses: the Choice of the Accounting Method, Accounting in Europe, vol.22, issue.2, pp.127-139, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0020-7063(99)80002-8
The logic of pension accounting, Accounting and Business Research, vol.146, issue.3, pp.231-249, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.09.003
Legitimating Transnational Standard-Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board, Journal of Business Ethics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.217-245, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
Positions taken in the fasb and iasb due process on accounting for employee stock options, Journal of accounting and finance research Summer, 2004. ,
IFRS and the Accounting Consensus, Accounting Horizons, vol.23, issue.1, pp.101-111, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.101
A Content Analysis of the Comprehensive Income Exposure Draft Comment Letters, Research in Accounting Regulation, vol.19, pp.53-79, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1052-0457(06)19003-7