W. Aerts, Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.30, issue.6, pp.493-517, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.aos.2004.07.001

M. Amen, Simulation-Based Comparison of Existent IAS 19 Accounting Options, European Accounting Review, vol.5, issue.2, pp.243-276, 2007.
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

T. H. Beechy, The Many Challenges of Pension Accounting, Accounting Perspectives, vol.21, issue.3, pp.91-111, 2009.
DOI : 10.1506/ap.8.2.1

M. Chatham, R. Larson, and A. Vietze, Issues affecting the development of an international accounting standard on financial instruments, Advances in accounting,incorporating Advances in international accounting, pp.97-107, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.adiac.2010.03.002

C. Cortese and H. Irvine, Investigating international accounting standard setting: The black box of IFRS 6, Research in Accounting Regulation, vol.22, issue.2, pp.87-95, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.racreg.2010.07.003

S. Demaria, Comptabilisation des écarts actuariels, mise en perspective des pratiques françaises. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion -direction et gestion des entreprises Septembre- Decembre, pp.245-246, 2010.

J. Fasshauer, M. Glaum, and D. Street, Adoption of ias 19 by europe's premier listed companies: Corridor approach versus full recognition: Summary of an acca research monograph Journal of international accounting, pp.113-122, 2008.

G. Georgiou, The iasb standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users. The british accounting review, pp.42-103, 2010.

M. Glaum, Pension accounting and research: A review, Accounting and Business Research, vol.1, issue.3, pp.273-311, 2009.
DOI : 10.1080/00014788.2008.9663336

G. Gray, J. Turner, P. Coram, and T. Mock, Perceptions and Misperceptions Regarding the Unqualified Auditor's Report by Financial Statement Preparers, Users, and Auditors, Accounting Horizons, vol.25, issue.4, pp.659-684, 2011.
DOI : 10.2308/acch-50060

R. Hooghiemstra, Letters to the shaeholders: A content analysis comparison of letter written by ceos in the united states and japan. The international journal of accounting, pp.45-275, 2010.

I. Koh and W. C. , Amendments to ias 19 employee benefits : Project summary and feedback statement Due process handbook What drives firms' decisions to lobby and determinants of their lobbying positions: Evidence from firms' comment letter submissions during the fasb's stock option expensing proposal, IFRS foundation, pp.46-47, 2004.

R. Larson, An examination of comment letters to the iasc: Special purpose entities Research in accounting regulation, pp.27-46, 2008.

M. Mensah, H. Nguyen, and S. Prattipati, Transparency of financial statement: A conceptual framework from a user perspective, The journal of american academy of business, vol.9, issue.1, pp.47-51, 2006.

A. I. Morais, Actuarial Gains and Losses: the Choice of the Accounting Method, Accounting in Europe, vol.22, issue.2, pp.127-139, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0020-7063(99)80002-8

C. Napier, The logic of pension accounting, Accounting and Business Research, vol.146, issue.3, pp.231-249, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.09.003

A. Richardson and B. Eberlein, Legitimating Transnational Standard-Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board, Journal of Business Ethics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.217-245, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9

G. Seamann, Positions taken in the fasb and iasb due process on accounting for employee stock options, Journal of accounting and finance research Summer, 2004.

S. Sunder, IFRS and the Accounting Consensus, Accounting Horizons, vol.23, issue.1, pp.101-111, 2009.
DOI : 10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.101

A. Yen, E. Hirst, and P. Hopkins, A Content Analysis of the Comprehensive Income Exposure Draft Comment Letters, Research in Accounting Regulation, vol.19, pp.53-79, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/S1052-0457(06)19003-7