Factors that Affect Depth Perception in Stereoscopic Displays, Human Factors, vol.32, issue.6, pp.655-67, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1177/001872089203400602
Limits of Fusion and Depth Judgment in Stereoscopic Color Displays, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol.32, issue.1, pp.45-60, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1177/001872089003200104
How the eye measures reality and virtual reality, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, vol.26, issue.4, pp.27-36, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.3758/BF03200563
Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol.1, issue.2, pp.144-67, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.9.3.427
Distance Estimation in Virtual Environments, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol.39, issue.20 ,
DOI : 10.1177/154193129503902006
Ordinal depth information from accommodation?, Ergonomics, vol.21, issue.3, pp.391-404, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00230024
Accommodation and Apparent Distance, Perception, vol.7, issue.5, pp.609-630, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1068/p170609
Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments, Vision Research, vol.35, issue.19, pp.2731-2737, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00018-U
Adaptive regulation in the vergence and accommodation control systems, Rev Oculomot Res, vol.1, pp.81-94, 1985. ,
Distance Perception within near Visual Space, Perception, vol.10, issue.1, pp.115-139, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1068/p3119
Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception, Perception, vol.88, issue.2, pp.167-81, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1068/p2737
Perceptual Issues in the Use of Head-Mounted Visual Displays, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol.48, issue.3, pp.555-73, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1518/001872006778606877
Living in a world transformed: Perceptual and performatory adaptation to visual distortion, p.12, 1992. ,
RESTRICTING THE FIELD OF VIEW: PERCEPTUAL AND PERFORMANCE EFFECTS, Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol.15, issue.1, pp.35-45, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.3758/BF03211217
Field of view affects reaching, not grasping, Experimental Brain Research, vol.135, issue.3, pp.411-417, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s002210000545
What is the minimum field of view required for efficient navigation?, Vision Research, vol.47, issue.16, pp.2115-2138, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.012
Influence de la taille du champ de vision sur la perception des distances proches en environnement virtuel, 2005. ,
On a neglected variable in theories of pictorial perception: truncation of the visual field Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems, Percept Psychophys Exp Brain Res, vol.23158, issue.20, pp.326-30328, 1978. ,
Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol.36, issue.3, pp.291-299, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1093/occmed/28.2.57
Telestereoscopic viewing within prehension space: initial effects and short-term visual adaptation):13. 23 Perception of distance in a binocular helmetmounted display: data from helicopter in-flight video tapes, Helmet-Mounted Displays III: SPIE 24. Teghtsoonian R, Teghtsoonian M. Scaling apparent distance in a natural outdoor setting, pp.66-70215, 1970. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00221-010-2188-4
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.635.1572
Engineering data compendium: Human perception and performance. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: AAMRL; 1988 Flight testing of a binocular bisensor HMD for helicopter: some human factors aspects ,
Helmet-and Head-Mounted Displays III: SPIE, pp.136-179, 1998. ,
Adaptation to increased interocular distance: survey of Tiger pilots training, HFM-141 Symposium on ,