C. Böhringer, C. Fischer, and K. E. , The Global Eects of Subglobal Climate Policies, The B, E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol.10, issue.2, 2010.

C. Böhringer, J. C. Carbone, and T. F. Rutherford, Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage, Energy Economics, vol.34, issue.S2, pp.208-217, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.011

F. Branger and P. Quirion, Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies, Ecological Economics, vol.99, pp.29-39, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.010
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01137932

D. Demailly and P. Quirion, abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation, Climate Policy, vol.34, issue.1, pp.93-113, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685590
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00719269

D. Demailly and P. Quirion, Leakage from Climate Policies and Border Tax Adjustment: Lessons from a Geographic Model of the Cement Industry The Design of Climate Policy, papers from a Summer Institute, 2008.

D. Demailly and &. P. , Quirion The Competitiveness Impact of CO2 Emissions Reduction in the Cement Sector Report for the OECD, 2004.

F. Ecofys, . Institute, I. Systems, . Research, and . Öko-institut, Methodology for the free allocation of emission allowances in the EU-ETS post 2012, 2009.

A. D. Ellerman, New Entrant and Closure Provisions: How do they Distort?, The Energy Journal, vol.29, issue.01, p.29, 2008.
DOI : 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-NoSI-5

A. D. Ellerman, F. J. Convery, and D. Perthuis, Pricing carbon: The European union emissions trading scheme, 2010.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139042765

C. Fischer and A. K. Fox, Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.64, issue.2, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.005

M. Fowlie, M. Reguant, and S. P. Ryan, Market-based emissions regulation and industry dynamics, National Bureau of Economic Research, vol.2012, 18645.

M. Grubb and S. Cooper, Revenue Dimension of the EU-ETS Phase III. Climate Strategies, 2011.

R. Golombek, S. A. Kittelsen, and K. E. , Price and welfare effects of emission quota allocation, Energy Economics, vol.36, pp.568-580, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.006

S. P. Holland, Emissions taxes versus intensity standards: Second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.63, issue.3, pp.375-387, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.12.002

C. Hood, Reviewing existing and proposed emission trading systems, IEA, vol.2010, issue.13, 2010.
DOI : 10.1787/5km4hv3mlg5c-en

J. Hourcade, D. Demailly, K. Neuho, and M. Sato, Dierentiation and dynamics of EU-ETS competitiveness impacts, Climate Strategies report, 2007.

C. Kettner, A. Koppl, and S. Schleicher, EU Emissions Trading Scheme: The phase 1 performance. WIFO, Austrian Institute for Economic Research, 2008.

R. Martin, M. Muûls, L. B. De-preux, and U. J. Wagner, Industry Compensation under Relocation Risk: a Firm-Level Analysis of the Eu Emissions Trading Scheme, working paper, 2012.

G. Meunier and J. Ponssard, Capacity decisions with demand uctuations and carbon leakage, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.36, p.436454, 2014.

S. Monjon and P. Quirion, How to design a border adjustment for the European Union Emissions Trading System?, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.9, p.51995207, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.005
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00827282

S. Monjon and P. Quirion, Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?, Ecological Economics, vol.70, issue.11, pp.70-19571971, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.020
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00715352

S. Monjon and P. Quirion, A border adjustment for the EU ETS: reconciling WTO rules and capacity to tackle carbon leakage, Climate Policy, vol.2, issue.1, p.12121225, 2011.
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2011.601907
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00827299

K. Neuho, K. K. Martinez, and M. Sato, Allocation, incentives and distortions: The impact of EU-ETS emission allowance allocations to the electricity sector, Climate Policy, vol.6, p.7391, 2006.

J. Ponssard and N. Walker, EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis, Climate Policy, vol.34, issue.2, p.467493, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10657-005-4199-3
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00332053

P. Quirion, Historic versus output-based allocation of GHG tradable allowances: a survey, Climate Policy, vol.9, p.575592, 2009.

P. Quirion, S. Healy, and K. Schumacher, Modelling the allowance allocation method of the EU-ETS: an application to the cement industry, Climate Strategies Report, 2012.

L. H. Röller and F. Steen, On the Workings of a Cartel: Evidence from the Norwegian Cement Industry, American Economic Review, vol.96, issue.1, p.321338, 2006.
DOI : 10.1257/000282806776157713

P. Wooders and A. Cosbey, Issues for the WTO Climate-linked taris and subsidies: Economic aspects (competitiveness & leakage), 2nd Conference Climate Change, Trade and Competitiveness, 2010.

/. Mt and . Comtrade, Part 2: Parameters calibrated Parameter Value Expected demand curve intercept (a) 180 e/t Standard deviation of ? 35 e, 2009.