AHP and uncertainty theories for decision making using the ER-MCDA methodology

Abstract : In this paper, we present the ER-MCDA methodology for multi-criteria decision-making based on imperfect information coming from more or less reliable and conflicting sources. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy Sets, Possibility and Belief Functions theories are combined to take a decision based on imprecise and uncertain evaluations of quantitative, qualitative criteria. Classical aggregation of criteria is replaced by a two-step fusion process using advanced fusion rules based on the Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) that allows to make a difference between importance, reliability and uncertainty of information sources and contents.
Document type :
Conference papers
Liste complète des métadonnées

Cited literature [23 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00655751
Contributor : Import Ws Irstea <>
Submitted on : Monday, January 2, 2012 - 11:08:12 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, March 26, 2019 - 2:24:42 PM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Tuesday, April 3, 2012 - 2:21:48 AM

File

gr2011-pub00034294.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00655751, version 1
  • IRSTEA : PUB00034294

Citation

J.M. Tacnet, J. Dezert, Mireille Batton-Hubert. AHP and uncertainty theories for decision making using the ER-MCDA methodology. International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy / Network Process, Jun 2011, Sorrento, Italy. 6 p. ⟨hal-00655751⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

661

Files downloads

665