&. O. Judd and . Corneille, The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism, pp.361-380

L. S. Aitken and S. G. West, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, 1991.

R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, The moderator???mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.51, issue.6, pp.1173-1182, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

H. Bless and N. Schwarz, Context effects in political judgement: assimilation and contrast as a function of categorization processes, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.116, issue.8, pp.287-291, 1998.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<159::AID-EJSP860>3.0.CO;2-4

M. B. Brewer, In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis., Psychological Bulletin, vol.86, issue.2, pp.307-324, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307

E. Castano, M. Paladino, A. Coull, and V. Y. Yzerbyt, Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol.41, issue.3, pp.365-385, 2002.
DOI : 10.1348/014466602760344269

A. Coull, V. Y. Yzerbyt, E. Castano, M. Paladino, and V. Leemans, Protecting the Ingroup: Motivated Allocation of Cognitive Resources in the Presence of Threatening Ingroup Members, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, pp.327-339, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/1368430201004004003

B. Doosje, N. Ellemers, and R. Spears, Perceived Intragroup Variability as a Function of Group Status and Identification, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.31, issue.5, pp.410-436, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/jesp.1995.1018

S. Eidelman, P. J. Silvia, and M. Beirnet, Responding to Deviance: Target Exclusion and Differential Devaluation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.32, issue.9, pp.1153-1164, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167206288720

P. Hutchison and D. Abrams, Ingroup identification moderates stereotype change in ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, 2003.

P. Hutchison, J. Jetten, J. Christian, and E. Haycraft, Protecting threatened identity, 2006.

Z. Kunda and K. C. Oleson, When exceptions prove the rule: How extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.72, issue.5, pp.965-979, 1997.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.965

J. M. Marques and D. Paez, The ???Black Sheep Effect???: Social Categorization, Rejection of Ingroup Deviates, and Perception of Group Variability, European Review of Social Psychology, vol.19, issue.1, 1994.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00855.x

J. M. Marques and V. Y. Yzerbyt, The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter-and intra-group situations, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.54, issue.3, pp.287-292, 1988.
DOI : 10.1002/ejsp.2420180308

K. Matheson, B. Cole, and K. Majka, Dissidence from within: Examining the effects of intergroup context on group members??? reactions to attitudinal opposition, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.39, issue.2, pp.161-169, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00515-2

B. Mullen, R. Brown, and C. Smith, Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.63, issue.2, pp.103-122, 1992.
DOI : 10.1002/ejsp.2420220202

M. E. Sobel, Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological methodology, pp.290-312, 1982.

H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, The social identity theory of intergroup behavior, 1986.

V. Y. Yzerbyt, E. Castano, J. Leyens, and M. Paladino, The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification, European Review of Social Psychology, vol.19, issue.1, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.48