. Labour-pr, labour productivity, D Labour pr.: Labour productivity growth, S/L: skill intensity

?. Huber and . White, ** denote significance at the level of 1, 5, and 10%, respectively Table 14 Trade policy instruments Year Trade policies 1975 National Agency for Export Promotion: to promote Chilean's exports by improving the international insertion of Chilean's firms 1976 Elimination of all non-tariffs barriers 1979 Uniform import tariff of 10% 1980 Economic complementation agreements: Latin American Integration Association (ALADI) Export Promotion Programme: to supply information on foreign markets and customers, promoting Chilean exports through generic publicity and targeted missions, and working to resolve the administrative problems faced by exporters 1983 Increase import tariff to 20% 1984 Increase import tariff to 35% 1985 Reduction of import tariffs to 20% Economic Positioning Campaign: to diffuse the country image in external markets. The programme is financed and organized jointly by PROCHILE and other organizations, 1988.

P. Aghion, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl, The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.72, issue.94, pp.20-32, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00205

R. Alvarez and R. Lopez, Exporting and performance: evidence from Chilean plants, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d&apos;<html_ent glyph="@eacute;" ascii="e"/>conomique, vol.11, issue.4, pp.1384-1400, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.001

M. Amiti and J. Konings, Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia, American Economic Review, vol.97, issue.5, pp.1611-1638, 2007.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.97.5.1611

J. E. Anderson and E. Van-wincoop, Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.1, pp.170-192, 2003.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803321455214

J. E. Anderson and E. Van-wincoop, Trade Costs, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.42, issue.3, pp.691-751, 2004.
DOI : 10.1257/0022051042177649

M. Arellano and S. Bond, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.58, issue.2, pp.277-297, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/2297968

S. L. Baier and J. H. Bergstrand, The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity, Journal of International Economics, vol.53, issue.1, pp.1-27, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00060-X

S. Bond, Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice, Portuguese Economic Journal, vol.1, issue.2, pp.141-162, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9

R. Bergoeing, P. J. Kehoe, T. J. Kehoe, and R. Soto, Policy-driven productivity in Chile and Mexico in the 1980s and 1990s, pp.16-21, 2002.
DOI : 10.3386/w8892

R. Bergoeing, N. Loayza, and A. Repetto, Slow recoveries, Journal of Development Economics, vol.75, issue.2, pp.473-506, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.007

R. Bergoeing, A. Hernando, and A. Repetto, MARKET REFORMS AND EFFICIENCY GAINS IN CHILE, Estudios de econom??a, vol.37, issue.2, 2006.
DOI : 10.4067/S0718-52862010000200004

A. B. Bernard, J. B. Jensen, and P. K. Shott, Survival of the best fit: Exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of U.S. manufacturing plants, Journal of International Economics, vol.68, issue.1, pp.219-237, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.002

R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and J. Van-reenen, Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, Review of Economic Studies, vol.66, issue.3, pp.529-554, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00097

B. Crépon and E. Duguet, Research and development, competition and innovation pseudo-maximum likelihood and simulated maximum likelihood methods applied to count data models with heterogeneity, Journal of Econometrics, vol.79, issue.2, pp.355-378, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00027-4

J. De-loecker, Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia, Journal of International Economics, vol.73, issue.1, pp.69-98, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.03.003

S. Devarajan and D. Rodrik, Trade liberalization in developing countries: Do imperfect competition and scale economies matter? The American Economic Review, pp.283-287, 1989.

R. C. Feenstra, Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence, 2003.

L. Fontagné, T. Mayer, and S. Zignago, Trade in the Triad: how easy is the access to large markets?, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d&apos;<html_ent glyph="@eacute;" ascii="e"/>conomique, vol.85, issue.4, pp.1402-1430, 2005.
DOI : 10.1162/003465300558533

J. Harrigan, Openness to trade in manufactures in the OECD, Journal of International Economics, vol.40, issue.1-2, pp.23-39, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1996(95)01395-4

K. Head and T. Mayer, Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU, Review of World Economics, vol.32, issue.7, pp.285-314, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(88)90113-4

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00267441

W. Greene, Econometric analysis, 2008.

H. Kasahara and J. Rodriguez, Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence, Journal of Development Economics, vol.87, issue.1, pp.106-118, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008

H. Katayama, S. Lu, and J. Tybout, Firm-level productivity studies: Illusions and a solution, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.27, issue.3, pp.403-413, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.002

A. Kraay, Exports and economic performance: Evidence from a panel of Chinese firms China and its regions, economic growth and reform in Chinese Provinces, pp.278-299, 2002.

J. Levinsohn and A. Petrin, Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables, Review of Economic Studies, vol.70, issue.2, pp.317-341, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00246

L. Liu and J. Tybout, Productivity growth in Colombia and Chile: Panel-based evidence on the role of entry, exit and learning, Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries, 1996.

J. Mccallum, National borders matter, American Economic Review, vol.85, issue.3, pp.615-623, 1995.

A. Nicita and &. M. Olarreaga, Trade and production, 1976-99. (Policy research working paper series 2701), 2001.

G. Nicoletti and S. Scarpetta, Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence, Economic Policy, vol.36, pp.9-72, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0327.00102

URL : http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19175

S. Olley and A. Pakes, The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry, Econometrica, vol.64, issue.6, pp.1263-1298, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2171831

N. Pavcnik, Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants, Review of Economic Studies, vol.69, issue.1, pp.245-276, 2002.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00205

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.196.8466

S. Redding and A. Venables, Economic geography and international inequality, Journal of International Economics, vol.62, issue.1, pp.53-82, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001

D. Rodrik, Closing the technology gap: Does trade liberalization really help? Trade policy, industrialization and development: New perspectives, 1992.

S. Silva, J. M. Tenreyro, and S. , The Log of Gravity, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.31, issue.02, pp.641-658, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00033-5

A. Schor, Heterogeneous productivity response to tariff reduction. Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms, Journal of Development Economics, vol.75, issue.2, pp.373-396, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.003

P. Tingvall and A. Poldahl, Is there really an inverted U-shaped relation between competition and R&D?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.12, issue.1, pp.101-118, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/10438590500129755

F. Windmeijer, A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators, Journal of Econometrics, vol.126, issue.1, pp.25-51, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005