Some nonasymptotic results on resampling in high dimension, II: Multiple tests, The Annals of Statistics, vol.38, issue.1, pp.83-99, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1214/08-AOS668
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00446197
False Discovery Rates for Spatial Signals, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.102, issue.480, pp.1272-1281, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1198/016214507000000941
Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies, Cancer Cell, vol.10, pp.529-541, 2006. ,
Introduction to Algorithms, 2000. ,
A note on the quadratic exponential binary distribution, Biometrika, vol.81, issue.2, pp.403-408, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/81.2.403
Statistics for spatial data, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9781119115151
ADaCGH: A Parallelized Web-Based Application and R Package for the Analysis of aCGH Data, PLoS ONE, vol.6, issue.8, p.737, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0000737.g005
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines and Primary Carcinomas, Cancer Research, vol.64, issue.14, pp.4817-4825, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0328
Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Microarray Experiments, Statistical Science, vol.18, issue.1, pp.71-103, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1214/ss/1056397487
On the False Discovery Rate and Expected Type I Errors, Biometrical Journal, vol.43, issue.8, pp.985-1005, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1002/1521-4036(200112)43:8<985::AID-BIMJ985>3.0.CO;2-4
The Inheritance Procedure: Multiple Testing of Tree-structured Hypotheses, Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol.11, issue.1, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1515/1544-6115.1554
The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control, The Annals of Statistics, vol.38, issue.6, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1214/10-AOS829
Comparing partitions, Journal of Classification, vol.78, issue.1, pp.193-218, 1985. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01908075
CGH microarrays and cancer, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol.19, issue.1, pp.36-40, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.11.004
Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data, Bioinformatics, vol.21, issue.19, pp.3763-3770, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti611
Hierarchical testing of variable importance, Biometrika, vol.95, issue.2, pp.265-278, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/asn007
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Cancer Investigation, vol.62, issue.9, pp.923-928, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1408
False Discovery Control for Random Fields, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.99, issue.468, pp.1002-1014, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1198/0162145000001655
Sparse representation and Bayesian detection of genome copy number alterations from microarray data, Bioinformatics, vol.24, issue.3, pp.309-318, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm601
Modified Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedures, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.69, issue.395, pp.826-831, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478341
CGHregions: dimension reduction for array CGH data with minimal information loss, Cancer Informatics, vol.2, pp.55-63, 2007. ,
CGHcall: calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles, Bioinformatics, vol.23, issue.7, pp.892-894, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm030
Weighted clustering of called array CGH data, Biostatistics, vol.9, issue.3, pp.484-500, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm048
The Fallback Procedure for Evaluating a Single Family of Hypotheses, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, vol.18, issue.6, pp.929-942, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1080/10543400500265660
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses, Bioinformatics, vol.21, issue.22, pp.4084-4091, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti677