H. Barrett, K. Myers, N. Devaney, and C. Dainty, Objective assessment of image quality IV Application to adaptive optics, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.23, issue.12, pp.3080-3105, 2006.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.23.003080

H. Barrett, J. Yao, J. Rolland, and K. Myers, Model observers for assessment of image quality, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, pp.9758-9756, 1993.

N. Damera-venkata, T. D. Kite, W. S. Geisler, B. L. Evans, and A. C. Bovik, Image quality assessment based on a degradation model, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.9, issue.4, pp.636-650, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/83.841940

Z. Wang, E. P. Simoncelli, and A. C. Bovik, Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment, Proc. of the 37th IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Sig., Sys. and Comp, 2003.

Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.13, issue.4, pp.600-612, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861

H. R. Sheikh and A. C. Bovik, Image information and visual quality, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.15, issue.2, pp.430-444, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2005.859378

D. M. Chandler and S. S. Hemami, VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.16, issue.9, pp.2284-2298, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2007.901820

M. Carnec, P. L. Callet, and D. Barba, Objective quality assessment of color images based on a generic perceptual reduced reference, Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.image.2008.02.003

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00287425

D. M. Rouse and S. S. Hemami, Analyzing the role of visual structure in the recognition of natural image content with multi-scale SSIM, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIII, p.6806, 2008.
DOI : 10.1117/12.768060

D. M. Chandler and S. S. Hemami, Dynamic contrast-based quantization for lossy wavelet image compression, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.14, issue.4, pp.397-410, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2004.841196

L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol.60, issue.1-4, pp.259-268, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F

G. Steidl, J. Weickert, T. Brox, P. Mrazek, and M. Welk, On the Equivalence of Soft Wavelet Shrinkage, Total Variation Diffusion, Total Variation Regularization, and SIDEs, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol.42, issue.2, pp.686-713, 2004.
DOI : 10.1137/S0036142903422429

J. Starck, M. Elad, and D. L. Donoho, Image decomposition via the combination of sparse representations and a variational approach, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.14, issue.10, pp.1570-1582, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2005.852206

F. Kozamernik, P. Sunna, E. Wyckens, and D. I. Pettersen, Subjective quality of internet video codecs phase ii evaluations using SAMVIQ, EBU Technical Review, 2005.

R. A. Bradley and M. E. Terry, RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS, Biometrika, vol.39, issue.3-4, pp.324-345, 1952.
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/39.3-4.324

D. E. Critchlow and M. A. Fligner, Paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM, Psychometrika, vol.34, issue.13, pp.517-533, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02294488

C. Poynton, The rehabilitation of gamma, Proc. SPIE, 1998.

G. Legge and J. Foley, Contrast masking in human vision, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.70, issue.12, pp.1458-1470, 1980.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.70.001458

D. M. Chandler and S. S. Hemami, Effects of natural images on the detectability of simple and compound wavelet subband quantization distortions, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.20, issue.7, 2003.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.20.001164

M. A. Georgeson and G. D. Sullivan, Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels., The Journal of Physiology, vol.252, issue.3, pp.627-656, 1975.
DOI : 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011162

N. Brady and D. J. Field, What's constant in contrast constancy? The effects of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns, Vision Research, vol.35, issue.6, pp.739-756, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00172-I

T. Stockham, Image processing in the context of a visual model, Proc. IEEE, pp.828-842, 1972.
DOI : 10.1109/PROC.1972.8782

J. L. Mannos, The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.20, issue.4, pp.525-536, 1974.
DOI : 10.1109/TIT.1974.1055250

W. A. Pearlman, A visual system model and a new distortion measure in the context of image processing*, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol.68, issue.3, pp.374-386, 1978.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSA.68.000374

D. Granrath, The role of human visual models in image processing, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.69, issue.5, pp.552-561, 1981.
DOI : 10.1109/PROC.1981.12024

R. J. Safranek and J. D. Johnston, A perceptually tuned sub-band image coder with image dependent quantization and post-quantization data compression, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp.1945-1948, 1989.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1989.266837

S. J. Daly, Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, pp.179-206, 1993.
DOI : 10.1117/12.135952

J. Lubin, The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance, Digital Images and Human Vision, pp.163-178, 1993.

A. B. Watson, DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images, Proc. SPIE: Human Vision, pp.202-216, 1913.

P. Teo and D. Heeger, Perceptual image distortion, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing, pp.127-141, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/ICIP.1994.413502

A. B. Watson, G. Y. Yang, J. A. Solomon, and J. Villasenor, Visibility of wavelet quantization noise, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.6, issue.8, pp.1164-1175, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/83.605413

T. N. Pappas and R. J. Safranek, Perceptual Criteria for Image Quality Evaluation, Handbook of Image and Video Processing, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-012119792-6/50118-2

D. Navon, Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception, Cognitive Psychology, vol.9, issue.3, pp.353-383, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3

H. R. Sheikh, A. C. Bovik, and G. De-veciana, An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol.14, issue.12, pp.2117-2128, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/TIP.2005.859389

D. M. Rouse and S. S. Hemami, Understanding and simplifying the structural similarity metric, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/ICIP.2008.4711973

M. J. Wainwright and E. P. Simoncelli, Scale mixtures of gaussians and the statistics of natural images, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp.855-861, 2000.

M. J. Wainwright, E. P. Simoncelli, and A. S. Willsky, Random cascades on wavelet trees and their use in analyzing and modeling natural images, Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing VIII, pp.89-123, 2001.
DOI : 10.1117/12.408598

E. P. Simoncelli and W. T. Freeman, The steerable pyramid: a flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/ICIP.1995.537667

S. Mallat and S. Zhong, Characterization of signals from multiscale edges, IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol.14, issue.7, pp.710-732, 1992.

C. Giardina and E. Dougherty, Morphological Methods in Image and Signal Process, 1998.

J. L. Devore, Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences., Biometrics, vol.47, issue.4, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/2532427