J. L. Burch, Quasi-neutrality in the polar cusp, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.81, issue.7, pp.469-472, 1985.
DOI : 10.1029/GL012i007p00469

S. W. Cowley, Excitation of ¯ow in the Earth's magnetosphereionosphere system: observations by incoherent scatter radar, in Polar cap boundary phenomena, NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, vol.509, pp.127-140, 1998.

S. W. Cowley, J. P. Morelli, and M. Lockwood, components of the interplanetary magnetic field, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.92, issue.A4, pp.5557-5564, 1991.
DOI : 10.1029/90JA02063

A. Etemadi, S. W. Cowley, M. Lockwood, B. J. Bromage, D. M. Willis et al., The dependence of high-latitude dayside ionospheric flows on the North-South component of the IMF: A high time resolution correlation analysis using EISCAT ???Polar??? and AMPTE UKS and IRM data, Planetary and Space Science, vol.36, issue.5, pp.471-498, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0032-0633(88)90107-9

M. R. Hairston and R. A. Heelis, Response time of the polar ionospheric convection pattern to changes in the north-south direction of the IMF, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.36, issue.5, pp.631-634, 1995.
DOI : 10.1029/94GL03385

J. P. Heppner and N. C. Maynard, Empirical high-latitude electric field models, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.89, issue.A5, pp.4467-4489, 1987.
DOI : 10.1029/JA092iA05p04467

M. Lockwood and M. F. Smith, The variation of reconnection rate at the dayside magnetopause and cusp ion precipitation, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.36, issue.4, pp.14-841, 1992.
DOI : 10.1029/92JA01261

J. Moen, D. A. Lorentzen, and F. Sigernes, Dayside moving auroral forms and bursty proton auroral events in relation to particle boundaries observed by NOAA 12, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol.97, issue.A7, pp.14-855, 1998.
DOI : 10.1029/97JA02877

P. H. Rei€ and J. L. Burch, IMF By-dependent plasma ¯ow and Birkeland currents in the dayside magnetosphere 2. A global model for northward and southward IMF, J. Geophys. Res, vol.90, pp.1595-1609, 1985.

M. H. Rees, On the interaction of auroral protons with the earth's atmosphere, Planetary and Space Science, vol.30, issue.5, pp.463-472, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0032-0633(82)90056-3

A. S. Rodger and M. Pinnock, The ionospheric response to ¯ux transfer events: the ®rst few minutes, pp.685-691, 1997.

J. M. Ruohoniemi and R. A. Greenwald, The response of high-latitude convection to a sudden southward IMF turning, Geophysical Research Letters, vol.100, issue.15, pp.2913-2916, 1998.
DOI : 10.1029/98GL02212

P. E. Sandholt, C. J. Farrugia, J. Moen, B. Noraberg, T. Lybekk et al., A classi®cation of dayside auroral forms and activities as a function of interplanetary magnetic ®eld orientation, J. Geophys. Res, vol.103, pp.23-325, 1998.

P. E. Sandholt, C. J. Farrugia, J. Moen, and S. W. Cowley, Dayside auroral con®gurations: Responses to southward and northward rotations of the interplanetary magnetic ®eld, J. Geophys. Res, vol.103, pp.20-279, 1998.

J. R. Taylor, S. W. Cowley, T. K. Yeoman, M. Lester, T. B. Jones et al., SuperDARN studies of the ionospheric convection response to a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic ®eld, pp.549-565, 1998.

H. Todd, S. W. Cowley, M. Lockwood, D. M. Willis, and H. Luè-hr, Response time of the high-latitude dayside ionosphere to sudden changes in the north-south component of the IMF, Planetary and Space Science, vol.36, issue.12, pp.1415-1428, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0032-0633(88)90008-6