Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel

Abstract : Global sensitivity analysis of complex numerical models can be performed by calculating variance-based importance measures of the input variables, such as the Sobol indices. However, these techniques, requiring a large number of model evaluations, are often unacceptable for time expensive computer codes. A well known and widely used decision consists in replacing the computer code by a metamodel, predicting the model responses with a negligible computation time and rending straightforward the estimation of Sobol indices. In this paper, we discuss about the Gaussian process model which gives analytical expressions of Sobol indices. Two approaches are studied to compute the Sobol indices: the first based on the predictor of the Gaussian process model and the second based on the global stochastic process model. Comparisons between the two estimates, made on analytical examples, show the superiority of the second approach in terms of convergence and robustness. Moreover, the second approach allows to integrate the modeling error of the Gaussian process model by directly giving some confidence intervals on the Sobol indices. These techniques are finally applied to a real case of hydrogeological modeling.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, 2009, 94, pp.742-751. 〈10.1016/j.ress.2008.07.008〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [30 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00239494
Contributeur : Bertrand Iooss <>
Soumis le : mercredi 6 février 2008 - 23:07:11
Dernière modification le : samedi 27 octobre 2018 - 01:29:49
Document(s) archivé(s) le : vendredi 7 mai 2010 - 21:39:16

Fichiers

SAMO_marrel_hal.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Citation

Amandine Marrel, Bertrand Iooss, Beatrice Laurent, Olivier Roustant. Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, 2009, 94, pp.742-751. 〈10.1016/j.ress.2008.07.008〉. 〈hal-00239494〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

981

Téléchargements de fichiers

819