. Qedoc-quiz and . Maker, php?title=Qedoc_Quiz_Maker QuizFaber : http://quizfaber.free.fr/index.htm NetQuiz Pro : http://www.ccdmd.qc.ca/catalogue/netquiz-pro-4?section=block_6 RealQuest

J. Andrade, J. Ares, R. Garcia, S. Rodriguez, M. Seoane et al., Guidelines for the development of e-learning systems by means of proactive questions, Computers & Education, vol.51, issue.4, pp.1510-1522, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.002

L. Audet, Les pratiques et défis de l'évaluation en ligne, 2011.

R. L. Bangert-drowns, C. Kulik, J. Kulik, and M. T. Morgan, The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events, Review of Educational Research, vol.61, issue.2, pp.61-213, 1991.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543061002213

J. Basque and K. Lundgren-cayrol, Une typologie des typologies des applications des TIC en éducation, Sciences et Techniques Educatives, vol.9, pp.3-4, 2002.

C. Bereiter, Education and mind in the knowledge age, 2002.

J. Bernier, Théorie des tests : Principes et techniques de base, 1985.

. Bleske-rechek, . April, N. Zeug, R. Webb, and . Mary, Discrepant performance on multiple???choice and short answer assessments and the relation of performance to general scholastic aptitude, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.32, issue.2, pp.89-105, 2007.
DOI : 10.1080/02602930600800763

B. S. Bloom, Le problème des deux sigmas, Assurer la réussite des apprentissages scolaires, pp.45-83, 1988.

G. M. Bodner, Statistical analysis of multiple-choice exams, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.57, issue.3, pp.188-190, 1980.
DOI : 10.1021/ed057p188

J. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school, 2000.

S. Bravard, Usages pédagogiques des QCM : Un guide pour la mise en place d'un questionnaire à choix multiple, URF Letttres et langues, 2005.

A. C. Butler, . Roediger, and L. Henry, Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing, Memory & Cognition, vol.6, issue.3, pp.604-616, 2008.
DOI : 10.3758/MC.36.3.604

D. Cheung and R. Bucat, How can we construct good multiple-choice items? Paper presented at the Science and Technology Education Conference, 2002.

M. M. Clarke, G. F. Madaus, C. L. Horn, and M. A. Ramos, Retrospective on educational testing and assessment in the 20th century, Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol.32, issue.2, pp.159-181, 2000.
DOI : 10.1080/002202700182691

G. T. Crisp and E. J. Palmer, Engaging academics with a simplified analysis of their Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ) assesment results, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol.4, issue.2, pp.88-106, 2007.

E. De-vries, Les logiciels d'apprentissage : panoplie ou éventail ? Revue Française de Pédagogie, pp.105-116, 2001.

F. Demaizière, Enseignement assisté par ordinateur, 1986.

C. Depover, L'ordinateur media d'enseignement, 1987.

P. Dessus, La planification de séquences d'enseignement, objet de description ou de prescription ? Revue Française de Pédagogie, pp.101-116, 2000.

P. Dessus and B. Lemaire, Assistance informatique à la correction de copies, Comprendre les apprentissages : sciences cognitives et éducation, pp.205-220, 2004.

C. Enard, Le guidage dans l'apprentissage, La formation par l'apprentissage, pp.113-156, 1970.

O. Erstad, Changing assessment practices and the role of it International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, pp.181-194, 2008.

A. L. Francis and J. Barnett, The Effect and Implications of a ???Self-Correcting??? Assessment Procedure, Teaching of Psychology, vol.6, issue.1, pp.38-41, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004

F. Georges and P. Pansu, Les feedbacks à l'école : un gage de régulation des comportements scolaires. Revue Français de Pédagogie, pp.101-124, 2011.
DOI : 10.4000/rfp.3239
URL : http://rfp.revues.org/pdf/3239

T. M. Haladyna, Developing and validating multiple-choice test items, Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2004.

T. M. Haladyna, S. M. Downing, and M. C. Rodriguez, A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment, Applied Measurement in Education, vol.24, issue.1, pp.309-334, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/0346-251X(88)90079-6

G. S. Hanna and T. R. Oaster, Toward a Unified Theory of Context Dependence, Reading Research Quarterly, vol.14, issue.2, pp.226-243, 1978.
DOI : 10.2307/747475

J. Hattie and H. Timperley, The Power of Feedback, Review of Educational Research, vol.77, issue.1, pp.81-112, 2007.
DOI : 10.3102/003465430298487

A. Johnstone, Effective practice in objective assessment. The skills of fixed response testing, UK): LTSN Physical Sciences, 2003.

M. Kalz, Placement support for learners in learning networks, 2009.

R. W. Kulhavy, Feedback in Written Instruction, Review of Educational Research, vol.47, issue.2, pp.211-232, 1977.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543047002211

D. Laveault and J. Grégoire, Introduction aux théories des tests en psychologie et en sciences de l'éducation, 2002.

L. Clainche and E. , The eLearning XHTML editor: Guide [de] l'utilisateur, 2010.

D. Leclercq, L'évolution des QCM, Recherches sur l'évaluation en éducation, pp.139-146, 2006.

C. Lemercier, A. Tricot, I. Chênerie, M. Dessus, D. Morancho et al., Quels apprentissages sont-ils possibles avec des exerciseurs multimédia en classe ? Réflexions théoriques et compte rendu d'une expérience, 2001.

V. Luengo, Les rétroactions épistémiques dans les Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain. . Grenoble: Université Joseph-Fourier, dossier pour l'habilitation à diriger des recherches, 2009.

G. F. Madaus and L. M. Dwyer, A short history of performance assessment: Lessons learned, Phi Delta Kappan, vol.80, issue.9, pp.688-695, 1999.

E. J. Marsh, H. L. Roediger, R. A. Bjork, and E. L. Bjork, The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.6, issue.2, pp.194-199, 2007.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03194051

R. E. Mayer and R. Colvin-clark, Instructional strategies for receptive learning environments Handbook of improving performance in the workplace, Instructional design and training delivery, pp.298-328, 2010.

M. Mcalpine, Principles of assessment, 2002.

B. Means, . Toyama, . Yukie, R. Murphy, and M. Bakia, Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, 2010.

J. M. Montepare, A self-correcting approach to multiple choice tests. Retrieved from http, 2005.

S. Narciss and K. Huth, How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning, Instructional design for multimedia learning, pp.181-195, 2004.

R. Osman and . Mohamed, Mesure et évaluation en éducation. s.l.: Cours de l'université virtuelle africaine, 2011.

S. J. Osterlind, Constructing test items, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-1071-3

F. Reif, Applying cognitive science to education, 2008.

M. C. Rodriguez, The art and science of item-writing: A meta-analysis of multiple-choice item format effects Paper presented at the, 1997.

H. L. Roediger and A. C. Butler, The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.15, issue.1, pp.20-27, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003

G. Roid and T. M. Haladyna, The Emergence of an Item-writing Technology, Review of Educational Research, vol.50, issue.2, pp.293-314, 1980.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543050002293

P. M. Sadler, The relevance of multiple- choice tests in assessing science understanding, Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view, pp.249-278, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-012498365-6/50013-5

V. J. Shute, Focus on Formative Feedback, Review of Educational Research, vol.78, issue.1, pp.153-189, 2008.
DOI : 10.3102/0034654307313795

C. Touchie, (s.d.). Guidelines for the development of multiple-choice questions

R. E. Tractenberg, M. M. Gushta, S. E. Mulroney, and P. A. Weissinger, Multiple choice questions can be designed or revised to challenge learners' critical thinking Advances in Health Sciences Education, pp.18-945, 2013.

J. B. Williams, Assertion???reason multiple???choice testing as a tool for deep learning: a qualitative analysis, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.13, issue.3, pp.31-287, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/02602930500352857