173 articles – 641 references  [version française]
HAL: insu-00411096, version 1

Short view  Export this paper
Tectonic interpretation of transient stage erosion rates at different spatial scales in an uplifting block
Carretier S., Poisson B., Vassallo R., Pepin E., Farias M.
Journal of Geophysical Research 114 (2009) F02003 - http://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00411096
Article in peer-reviewed journal
Sciences of the Universe/Earth Sciences/Geophysics
Physics/Physics/Geophysics
Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
Tectonic interpretation of transient stage erosion rates at different spatial scales in an uplifting block
S. Carretier 1, Blanche Poisson 2, Riccardo Vassallo 3, E. Pepin 1, M. Farias 4
1:  Laboratoire des Mécanismes et Transfert en Géologie (LMTG)
http://www.lmtg.obs-mip.fr/
CNRS : UMR5563 – Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées – Université Paul Sabatier [UPS] - Toulouse III – Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UMR154
14 avenue Edouard Belin 31400 Toulouse
France
2:  Bureau de recherches géologiques et minières (BRGM)
http://www.brgm.fr/
Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM)
France
3:  Laboratoire de géodynamique des chaines alpines (LGCA)
http://lgca.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/
CNRS : UMR5025 – OSUG – INSU – Université de Savoie – Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble I
1381 rue de la Piscine 38400 Saint-Martin d'Hères
France
4:  Departamento de Geologìa
Universidad de Chile
Santiago
Chile
We explore the extent to which it is possible to convert erosion rate data into uplift rate or erosion laws, using a landscape evolution model. Transient stages of topography and erosion rates of a block uplifting at a constant rate are investigated at different spatial scales, for a constant climate, and for various erosion laws and initial topographies. We identify three main model types for the evolution of the mountain‐scale mean erosion rate: “linear”‐type, “sigmoid”‐type and “exponential”‐type. Linear‐type models are obtained for topographies without drainage system reorganization, in which river incision rates never exceed the uplift rate and stepped river terraces converge upstream. In sigmoid‐type and exponential‐type models (typically detachment‐limited or transport‐limited models with a significant transport threshold), drainage growth lasts a long time, and correspond to more than linear transport laws in water discharge and slope. In exponential‐type models, the mean erosion rate passes through a maximum that is higher than the rock uplift rate. This happens when the time taken to connect the drainage network exceeds half the total response time to reach dynamic equilibrium. River incision rates can be much greater than the uplift rate in both cases. In the exponential‐type model, river terraces converge downstream. Observations of a mountain in the Gobi‐Altay range in Mongolia support the exponential‐type model. This suggests that the erosion of this mountain is either detachment‐limited or transport‐limited with a significant transport threshold. This study shows that drainage growth could explain differences in erosion rate measurements on different spatial scales in a catchment.
English

Journal of Geophysical Research (J. Geophys. Res. (B Solid Earth))
Publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
ISSN 0148-0227 
international
2009-04-01
114
F02003

erosion rate – uplift – river profile

Project Id project “ANDES”, IRD, ANR-06-JCJC-0100, and the Chilean Anillo (project ACT-18)