4125 articles  [english version]
HAL : halshs-00258377, version 1

Fiche détaillée  Récupérer au format
Angels in Medieval Philosophy Inquiry. Their Function and Significance, Isabel Iribarren, Martin Lenz (Ed.) (2008) 29-44
Deplatonising the Celestial Hierarchy. Peter John Olivi's interpretation of the Pseudo-Dionysius
Sylvain Piron 1, 2
(2008)

A major question underlies any discussion of angels in medieval theology : should the intellectual substances of Greek philosophy be identified with Biblical angels ? While Thomas Aquinas gives a clear positive answer, Albertus Magnus and Peter John Olivi opt for the negative. For Albertus, the distinction is necessary for the sake of the philosophical enquiry on the natural world ; for Olivi, this is a theological requirement, meant to suppress all natural mediations between God and the human world. This perspective leads him to a radical decision in his interpretation of the pseudo-Dionysian Celestial Hierarchy ; all that is said there on the circulation of divine illumination only refers to the diffusion of heavenly glory, and has nothing to do with the natural state of angels.
1 :  Groupe d'anthropologie scolastique/Equipe CRH (GAS-CRH)
École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [EHESS] – CNRS : UMR8558
2 :  Centre de recherches historiques (CRH)
CNRS : UMR8558 – École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [EHESS]
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Histoire

Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie
Angels – scholasticism – Albertus Magnus – Thomas Aquinas – Peter John Olivi – Pseudo-Dionysius
Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
PDF
Deplatonising_the_celestial_hierarchy.pdf(203.9 KB)