Regional differences in subduction ground motions - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2012

Regional differences in subduction ground motions

Résumé

A few ground-motion prediction models have been published in the last years, for predicting ground motions produced by interface and intraslab earthquakes. When one must carry out a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in a region including a subduction zone, GMPEs must be selected to feed a logic tree. In the present study, the aim is to identify which models provide the best fit to the dataset M6+, global or local models. The subduction regions considered are Japan, Taiwan, Central and South America, and Greece. Most of the data comes from the database built to develop the new BCHydro subduction global GMPE (Abrahamson et al., submitted). We show that this model is among best-fitting models in all cases, followed closely by Zhao et al. (2006), whereas the local Lin and Lee (2008) is well predicting the data in Taiwan and also in Greece. The Scherbaum et al. (2009) LLH method prove to be efficient in providing one number quantifying the overall fit, but additional analysis on the between-event and within-event variabilities are mandatory, to control if median prediction per event and/or variability within an event is within the scatter predicted by the model.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Beauval-etal-WCEE2012.pdf (2.21 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00764211 , version 1 (13-12-2012)

Identifiants

Citer

Céline Beauval, F. Cotton, N. Abrahamson, N. Theodulidis, E. Delavaud, et al.. Regional differences in subduction ground motions. World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sep 2012, Lisbonne, Portugal. pp.Abstract No. 5187. ⟨hal-00764211⟩
368 Consultations
115 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More