The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A " Trompe l'œil " Perspective - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Autre Publication Scientifique Année : 2012

The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A " Trompe l'œil " Perspective

Résumé

This paper analyzes the difficulties of comparing the respective effectiveness of two among the most important liability regimes in tort law: rule of negligence and strict liability. Starting from the standard Shavellian unilateral accident scheme, I show that matching up liability regime on their capacity to provide the highest level of safety is ineffective. This demonstration lies on two components. The first one gathers some results drawn from literature that introduces uncertainty. The second one takes into consideration the beliefs of agents and their aversion to ambiguity. The model applies uncertainty to the level of maximum damage. This demonstration reinforces the previous result. Hence, both regimes apply on specific tort question and comparing their individual efficiency needs to call for other components as the transaction costs associated to the burden of evidence, the fairness between victims and injurers, etc.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
20122281249144NDL2012-008.pdf (756.58 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00727223 , version 1 (03-09-2012)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00727223 , version 1

Citer

Gérard Mondello. The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A " Trompe l'œil " Perspective. 2012, pp.30. ⟨hal-00727223⟩
91 Consultations
115 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More