Automata vs. Logics on Data Words

Michael Benedikt (1) , Clemens Ley (1) , Gabriele Puppis (2)

1 OUCL - Computing Laboratory
2 LaBRI - Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique

The relationship between automata and logics has been investigated since the 1960s. In particular, it was shown how to determine, given an automaton, whether or not it is definable in first-order logic with label tests and the order relation, and for first-order logic with the successor relation. In recent years, there has been much interest in languages over an infinite alphabet. Kaminski and Francez introduced a class of automata called finite memory automata (FMA), that represent a natural analog of finite state machines. A FMA can use, in addition to its control state, a (bounded) number of registers to store and compare values from the input word. The class of data languages recognized by FMA is incomparable with the class of data languages defined by first-order formulas with the order relation and an additional binary relation for data equality. We first compare the expressive power of several variants of FMA with several data word logics. Then we consider the corresponding decision problem: given an automaton A and a logic, can the language recognized by A be defined in the logic? We show that it is undecidable for several variants of FMA, and then investigate the issue in detail for deterministic FMA. We show the problem is decidable for first-order logic with local data comparisons -- an analog of first-order logic with successor. We also show instances of the problem for richer classes of first-order logic that are decidable.

Domaines: Théorie et langage formel [cs.FL]

Michael Benedikt, Clemens Ley, Gabriele Puppis. Automata vs. Logics on Data Words. Proceedings of CSL 2010, 2010, Brno, Czech Republic. pp.110-124, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-15205-4_12⟩. ⟨hal-00717770⟩