Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) versus ranibizumab (Lucentis) for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: a safety review
Résumé
Aim: We conducted a systematic review to compare adverse effects (AE) and the reporting of harm in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs evaluating intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched with no limitations of language and year of publication. We included studies which compared bevacizumab or ranibizumab as monotherapy with any other control group. Case series were included if they met predefined quality standards. Results: The 2-year results of phase III trials evaluating ranibizumab show that the rates of serious ocular AE were low (≤2.1%) but indicate major safety concerns (Risk ratio (RR) 3.13, 95%-CI 1.10-8.92). We also noted a possible signal with regards to thromboembolic events (RR 1.35, 95%-CI 0.66-2.77) and a significant increase in non-ocular haemorrhage (RR 1.62, 95%-CI 1.03-2.55). In contrast to ranibizumab trials, the RCTs evaluating bevacizumab are of limited value. The main shortcomings are small sample sizes and an apparent lack of rigorous monitoring for AE. A critical assessment of the large number of published case series evaluating bevacizumab also shows that no reliable conclusions on safety can be drawn using this study design. Therefore, any perception that intravitreal bevacizumab injections are not associated with major ocular or systemic AE are not supported by reliable data. Conclusion: The bevacizumab studies show too many methodological limitations to rule out any major safety concerns. Higher evidence from ranibizumab trials suggests signals for an increased ocular and systemic vascular and haemorrhagic risk which warrants further investigation.
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...