The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's Disease clinical trials: Psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Année : 2010

The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's Disease clinical trials: Psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts

Stefan J Cano
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 897358
Holly Posner
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 897359
Margaret Moline
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 897360
Jina Schwartz
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 897362
Tim Hsu
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 897363
Jeremy Hobart
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 897358

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur

Résumé

Background & Aims: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Behaviour Section (ADAS-cog), a measure of cognitive performance, has been used widely in AD trials. Its key role in clinical trials should be supported by evidence that it is both clinically meaningful and scientifically sound. Its conceptual and neuropsychological underpinnings are well-considered, but its performance as an instrument of measurement has received less attention. Objective: To examine the traditional psychometric properties of the ADAS-cog in a large sample of people with AD. Methods: Data from three clinical trials of donepezil (Aricept®) in mild-to-moderate AD (n=1421; MMSE 10-26) were analysed at both the scale- and component-level. Five psychometric properties were examined using traditional psychometric methods. These methods of examination underpin upcoming FDA recommendations for patient rating scale evaluation. Results: At the scale-level, criteria tested for data completeness, scaling assumptions (eg component total correlations= 0.39-0.67), targeting (no floor or ceiling effects), reliability (eg Cronbach's alpha = 0.84; test retest intraclass correlations = 0.93) and validity (correlation with MMSE = -0.63) were satisfied. At the component-level 7 of 11 ADAS-cog components had substantial ceiling effects (range 40-64%). Conclusions: Performance was satisfactory at the scale level, but most ADAS-cog components were too easy for many patients in this sample and did not reflect the expected depth and range of cognitive performance. The clinical implication of this finding is that the ADAS-cog's estimate of cognitive ability, and its potential ability to detect differences in cognitive performance under treatment, could be improved. However, because of the limitations of traditional psychometric methods, further evaluations would be desirable using additional rating scale analysis techniques to pinpoint specific improvements.

Mots clés

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
PEER_stage2_10.1136%2Fjnnp.2009.204008.pdf (180.27 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00580696 , version 1 (29-03-2011)

Identifiants

Citer

Stefan J Cano, Holly Posner, Margaret Moline, Stephen Hurt, Jina Schwartz, et al.. The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's Disease clinical trials: Psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 2010, 81 (12), pp.1363. ⟨10.1136/jnnp.2009.204008⟩. ⟨hal-00580696⟩

Collections

PEER
82 Consultations
3222 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More