Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: a study of the development of the metaphor of genetic code

Susanne Knudsen (1)

1 Department of Communication Studies at Roskilde University in Denmark

Metaphors are more popular than ever in the study of scientific reasoning and culture because of their innovative and generative powers. It is assumed, that novel scientific metaphors become more clear and well-defined, as they become more established and conventional within the relevant discourses. But we still need empirical studies of the career of metaphors in scientific discourse and of the communicative strategies identifying a given metaphor as either novel or conventional. This paper presents a case study of the dis-cursive development of the metaphor of “the genetic code” from the introduction of the metaphor to its establishment as an entire network of interrelated conventional metaphors. Not only do the strategies in communicating the metaphor change as the metaphor becomes more established within the discourse, but the genres in which the metaphor is developed and interpreted change too during the career of the metaphor. Whereas the standard scientific article is central in experimentally researching and explaining the metaphor, a mixture of more popular scientific genres dominates in the innovative conceptual development of the metaphor.

Mots clés: Social Sciences & Humanities

Susanne Knudsen. Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: a study of the development of the metaphor of genetic code. Public Understanding of Science, 2005, 14 (4), pp.373-392. ⟨10.1177/0963662505056613⟩. ⟨hal-00571070⟩