Analysis of clinical outcomes according to original treatment groups 16 years after the pivotal IFNB-1b trial - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Année : 2010

Analysis of clinical outcomes according to original treatment groups 16 years after the pivotal IFNB-1b trial

George Cornell Ebers
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 890076

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Anthony Traboulsee
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890077
David Li
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890078
Dawn Langdon
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 884854
Anthony Reder
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890079
Douglas Goodin
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890080
Karola Beckmann
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890082
Christian Wolf
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890083
Andreas Konieczny
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 890084

Résumé

Background: Evidence for efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis (MS) comes from trials of short duration. We report results from a 16-year, retrospective follow-up of the pivotal interferon beta-1b (IFNB-1b) study. Methods: The 372 trial patients had been randomly assigned to placebo (n = 123), IFNB-1b 50 ìg (n = 125), or IFNB-1b 250 ìg (n = 124) subcutaneously every other day for at least 2 years. Some remained randomised for up to 5 years, but subsequently patients received therapy according to physician discretion. Patients were re-contacted and asked to participate. Efficacy-related measures included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters, relapse rate, the Expanded Disability Status Scale, the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure, and conversion to secondary progressive MS. Results: Of the 88.2% (328/372) of patients who were identified, 69.9% (260/372) had available case report forms. No differences in outcome between original randomisation groups could be discerned using standard disability and MRI measures. However, mortality rates among patients originally treated with IFNB-1b were lower than in the original placebo group (18.3% [20/109] for placebo vs 8.3% [9/108] for IFNB-1b 50 ìg and 5.4% [6/111] for IFNB-1b 250 ìg). Conclusions: The original treatment assignment could not be shown to influence standard assessments of long-term efficacy. On-study behaviour of patients was influenced by factors that could not be controlled with the sacrifice of randomisation and blinding. Mortality was higher in patients originally assigned to placebo than those who had received IFNB-1b 50 ìg or 250 ìg. The dataset provides important resources to explore early predictors of long-term outcome.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
PEER_stage2_10.1136%2Fjnnp.2009.204123.pdf (534.17 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00557446 , version 1 (19-01-2011)

Identifiants

Citer

George Cornell Ebers, Anthony Traboulsee, David Li, Dawn Langdon, Anthony Reder, et al.. Analysis of clinical outcomes according to original treatment groups 16 years after the pivotal IFNB-1b trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 2010, 81 (8), pp.907. ⟨10.1136/jnnp.2009.204123⟩. ⟨hal-00557446⟩

Collections

PEER
308 Consultations
376 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More