IMPACT OF UK NATIONAL GUIDELINES BASED ON FRAX® - COMPARISON WITH CURRENT CLINICAL PRACTICE - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Clinical Endocrinology Année : 2010

IMPACT OF UK NATIONAL GUIDELINES BASED ON FRAX® - COMPARISON WITH CURRENT CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nicola Crabtree
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 888390

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Natalie Bebbington
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888391
Deirdre Chapman
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888392
Yasmin Wahid
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888393
John Ayuk
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888394
Chris Boivin
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888395
Mark S Cooper
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888396
Neil Gittoes
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 888397

Résumé

Objective: To assess whether clinician-determined treatment intervention thresholds are in line with the assessment of fracture risk provided by FRAX® and treatment recommendations provided by UK guidelines produced by the National Osteoporosis Guidelines Group (NOGG). Design, Patients and Measurements: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 288 patients consecutively referred for DXA scanning from primary care immediately prior to the introduction of the FRAX® algorithm. In addition to DXA assessment, patients completed a clinical risk factor questionnaire which included risk factors used in the FRAX® algorithm. Initial risk assessment and treatment decisions were performed after DXA. FRAX® was used, retrospectively, with femoral neck T-score, to estimate fracture risk which was applied to NOGG to generate guidance on treatment intervention. Clinician- and NOGG-determined outcomes were audited for concordance. Results: There was concordance between clinician and NOGG treatment decisions in 210 (72.9%) subjects. Discordance was observed in 78 (27.1%) subjects. In the discordant group, 7 subjects were given lifestyle advice when NOGG recommended treatment, 41 given treatment when NOGG recommended lifestyle advice only, and 30 were referred to a metabolic bone clinic for further evaluation. The reasons for treatment differences in subjects recommended treatment by clinician but not NOGG were largely (90.2%) due to use of lumbar spine BMD. Conclusions: There is high concordance between clinician-determined and FRAX®-NOGG intervention. The absence of spine BMD from FRAX® is the primary source of discrepancy. This study provides some assurance of the validity of the treatment thresholds generated from FRAX®-NOGG in ‘real-world' usage.

Mots clés

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
PEER_stage2_10.1111%2Fj.1365-2265.2010.03844.x.pdf (171.87 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00553274 , version 1 (07-01-2011)

Identifiants

Citer

Nicola Crabtree, Natalie Bebbington, Deirdre Chapman, Yasmin Wahid, John Ayuk, et al.. IMPACT OF UK NATIONAL GUIDELINES BASED ON FRAX® - COMPARISON WITH CURRENT CLINICAL PRACTICE. Clinical Endocrinology, 2010, ⟨10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03844.x⟩. ⟨hal-00553274⟩

Collections

PEER
66 Consultations
195 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More