ENTRE UTILITARISME ET PESSIMISME, POUR UNE RECHERCHE UTILE, UTILISABLE ET UTILISEE

Jean-Philippe Tonneau (1) , E. Barros da Rocha (2)

1 UMR TETIS - Territoires, Environnement, Télédétection et Information Spatiale
2 Empresa Baiana de Desenvolvimento Agrícola

There is not a day without a book, a debate, a declaration underlining the limits of our development: economic limits, ecological limits, social limits. Growth never creates enough jobs. Global warming is becoming a reality for everyone. Pollution multiplies and poses public health problems. Exclusion, even if misery is, of course, more present in the South, is occuring everywhere. However, science has never been so productive in knowledge and technology. But in spite of these technologies, we observe that bad-development and its demonstrations (resources crisis, industrial pollution, misery, exclusion...) are always present. This paradox remains even if science has never been so attentive to social request nor so worried by its “utility”. The expression “social request” suggests that actors external to the scientific community should contribute to the definition of the research problems (Grossetti, 2000). Gibbons et al. (1994) defend a new method of knowledge production, focused on the problems to solve as they are defined by industry or the public authorities, in rupture with the academic organization of disciplines and universities. These choices result in a “useful” research, even utilitarian, conceived for its applications, but without real capacities to think towards the future. The authors defend the idea that the future is so uncertain that science cannot be fully mobilized. They justify this assumption by showing the insufficiency of the answers to the challenges of sustainable development and by underlining the low capacity of innovation of society to face changes. Using the concept of “capacity of adaptation” developed within the reflection on the climate change, they propose the adaptation of the processes of innovation in link to sustainable development thanks to training processes and competency reinforcement. They recommend a “citizen” research to orient the actors' choices. They insist on and detail the main roles of this research: social experimentation and information management to work out at the same time a society project and to develop the answers that this project requires.

Mots clés: information; territorial development; knowledge and skills; capacities; research; social experimentation

Domaines: Agriculture, économie et politique

Jean-Philippe Tonneau, E. Barros da Rocha. ENTRE UTILITARISME ET PESSIMISME, POUR UNE RECHERCHE UTILE, UTILISABLE ET UTILISEE. ISDA 2010, Jun 2010, Montpellier, France. 12 p. ⟨hal-00526985⟩